The Scam Behind The Rise In Oil, Food Prices
Speculation on the futures market, rather than supply and demand, is driving up costs, analysts say.
The global economy and its recovery, and the living standards of millions of plain folks, are now at risk from the sudden rise in oil and commodity prices.
Gas at the pump is up, and going higher. Food prices are following.
The consequences are catastrophic for the global poor as their costs go up while their income doesn't. It's menacing American workers too, who in large part have not seen a meaningful raise since the days of Reagan (keeping it this way is clearly behind the current flurry of attacks on unions).
Already, unrest in the Middle East and many African countries is being blamed for these dramatic increases. It seems as if this threat to global stability is being largely ignored in our media, one that treats the oil business as just another mystical world of free market trading.
Why is it happening? Why all the volatility? Is oil getting scarcer, leading to price increases? Is the cost of food, similarly, a reflection of naturally increasing commodity prices?
Oil speculating
While it's true that natural disasters and droughts play some role in this unchecked price inflation, it also seems apparent that something else is attracting increasing attention, even if most of our media fails to explore what is a political time bomb, while most political leaders shrug their shoulder and ignore it.
President Obama recently said there is nothing he can do about the hike in oil and food prices.
Critics say the problem is that government and media outlets alike refuse to recognise what's really going on: unchecked speculation!
Not everyone buys into this suspicion. In fact, it is one of more intense subjects of debate in economics.
Princeton University economist Paul Krugman pooh-poohs the impact of speculation counter-posing the traditional argument that oil prices are set by supply and demand.
The Economist agrees, summing up its views with a pithy phrase, "Speculation does not drive the oil price. Driving does."
Others, like oil industry analyst Michael Klare of Hampshire College in the US, sees demand outdistancing supply:
| Consider the recent rise in the price of oil just a faint and early tremor heralding the oilquake to come. Oil won't disappear from international markets, but in the coming decades it will never reach the volumes needed to satisfy projected world demand, which means that, sooner rather than later, scarcity will become the dominant market condition. |
Usually you hear this debate in scholarly circles or read it in political tracts where orthodox views collide with more alarmist projections about the oil supply "peaking".
But officials in the Third World don't see the subject as academic. Reserve Bank of India Governor Duvvuri Subbarao charges that: "Speculative movements in commodity derivative markets are also causing volatility in prices".
The World Bank has held meetings on the issue, because it is seen as a matter of "utmost urgency".
"The price of food is a matter of life and death for the very poorest people in the world," said Tom Arnold, CEO of Concern Worldwide, the international humanitarian agency, ahead of his participation at The Open Forum on Food at World Bank headquarters.
"With many families spending up to 80 per cent of their income on basic foods to survive, even the slightest increase in price can have devastating effects and become a crises for the poorest," he said.
Journalist Josh Clark argues on the website "How Stuff Works" that much of the oil speculation is rooted in the financial crisis:
|
The next time you drive to the gas station, only to find prices are still sky high compared to just a few years ago, take notice of the rows of foreclosed houses you'll pass along the way. They may seem like two parts of a spell of economic bad luck, but high gas prices and home foreclosures are actually very much inter-related. Before most people were even aware there was an economic crisis, investment managers abandoned failing mortgage-backed securities and looked for other lucrative investments. What they settled on was oil futures. |
Whistleblowers on oil speculation
The debate within the industry is more subdued, perhaps to avoid a public fight between suppliers and distributors who don't want to rock the boat.
But some officials like Dan Gilligan, president of the Petroleum Marketers Association, representing 8,000 retail and wholesale suppliers has spoken out.
"Approximately 60 to 70 percent of the oil contracts in the futures markets are now held by speculative entities," he argues. "Not by companies that need oil, not by the airlines, not by the oil companies. But by investors who profit money from their speculative positions."
Now, a prominent and popular market analyst is throwing caution to the wind by blowing the whistle on speculators.
Finance expert Phil Davis runs a website and widely read newsletter to monitor stocks and options trades. He's a professional's professional, whose grandfather taught him to buy stocks when he was just ten years old.
His website is Phil's Stock World, and stocks are his world. He's subtitled the site: "High Finance for Real People."
He is usually a sober and calm analyst, not known as maverick or dissenter.
When I met Phil the other night, he was on fire, enraged by what he believes is the scam of the century that no one wants to talk about, because so many powerful people armed with legions of lawyers want unquestioning allegiance, and will sue you into silence.
He studies the oil/food issue carefully and has concluded:
|
It's a scam folks, it's nothing but a huge scam and it's destroying the US economy as well as the entire global economy but no one complains because they are 'only' stealing about $1.50 per gallon from each individual person in the industrialised world.
It's the top 0.01 per cent robbing the next 39.99 per cent – the bottom 60 per cent can't afford cars anyway (they just starve quietly to death, as food prices climb on fuel costs). If someone breaks into your car and steals a $500 stereo, you go to the police, but if someone charges you an extra $30 every time you fill up your tank 50 times a year ($1,500) you shut up and pay your bill. Great system, right? |
Phil is just getting started, as he delves into the intricacies of the NYMEX market that handles these trades:
|
The great thing about the NYMEX is that the traders don't have to take delivery on their contracts, they can simply pay to roll them over to the next settlement price, even if no one is actually buying the barrels. That's how we have developed a massive glut of 677 million barrels worth of contracts in the front four months on the NYMEX and, come rollover day – that will be the amount of barrels "on order" for the front 3 months, unless a lot barrels get dumped at market prices fast.
Keep in mind that the entire United States uses 'just' 18M barrels of oil a day, so 677M barrels is a 37-day supply of oil. But, we also make 9M barrels of our own oil and import 'just' 9M barrels per day, and 5M barrels of that is from Canada and Mexico who, last I heard, aren't even having revolutions. So, ignoring North Sea oil Brazil and Venezuela and lumping Africa in with OPEC, we are importing 3Mbd from unreliable sources and there is a 225-day supply under contract for delivery at the current price or cheaper plus we have a Strategic Petroleum Reserve that holds another 727 Million barrels (full) plus 370M barrels of commercial storage in the US (also full) which is another 365.6 days of marginal oil already here in storage in addition to the 225 days under contract for delivery. |
These contracts for oil outnumber their actual delivery, a sign of speculation and market manipulation, as oil companies win government authorisations for wells but then don't open them for exploration or exploitation.
It's all a game of manipulating oil supply to keep prices up. And no one seems to be regulating it.
Danger met with silence
What Phil sees is a giant but intricate game of market manipulation and rigging by a cartel – not just an industry –that actually has loaded tankers criss-crossing the oceans but only landing when the price is right.
|
There is nothing that the conga-line of tankers between here and OPEC would like to do more than unload an extra 277 million barrels of crude at $112.79 per barrel (Friday's close on open contracts and price) but, unfortunately, as I mentioned last week, Cushing, Oklahoma (Where oil is stored) is already packed to the gills with oil and can only handle 45M barrels if it started out empty so it is, very simply, physically impossible for those barrels to be delivered. This did not, however, stop 287M barrels worth of May contracts from trading on Friday and GAINING $2.49 on the day. |
He asks: "Who is buying 287,494 contracts (1,000 barrels per contract) for May delivery that can't possibly be delivered for $2.49 more than they were priced the day before? These are the kind of questions that you would think regulators would be asking – if we had any."
The TV news magazine 60 minutes spoke with Dan Gilligan who noted that investors don't actually take delivery of the oil. "All they do is buy the paper, and hope that they can sell it for more than they paid for it. Before they have to take delivery."
He says they make their fortunes "on the volatility that exists in the market. They make it going up and down."
Payam Sharifi, at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, notes that even as the rise in oil prices threatens the world economy, there is almost total silence on the danger:
| This issue ought to be discussed again with a renewed interest – but the media and much of the populace at large have simply accepted high food and oil prices as an unavoidable fact of life, without any discussion of the causes of these price rises aside from platitudes. |
Danny Schechter made the film Plunder The Crime of Our Time (Plunderthecrimeofourtime.com) on the financial crisis as a crime story. He also wrote an introduction to the recent reissue of a classic two-volume expose of John D. Rockefeller's The Standard Oil Company (Cosimo Books), one of the top ten works top works of investigative reporting in America.





Food Poverty Crisis is Dilemma
By Wilson, Brad at Apr 24, 2011 20:51 PM
The rise in food prices is misunderstood here and in many similar places as well as all across the mainstream media. The main cause of what should be called the “food poverty crisis” is not higher farm commodity prices since 2006, but rather lower and lower and lower farm prices since 1953.
One thing not mentioned here and usually not mentioned elsewhere is that Least Developed Countries are 70% rural and dependent upon a healthy farm economy and high enough farm prices. FAO’s 2009 report, “The State of Food and Agriculture: Livestock in the Balance,” states on page 3 that “Almost 80 percent of the world’s undernourished people live in rural areas (UN Millennium Project, 2004) and most depend on agriculture... for their livelihoods.”
Prior to 2006, any article on hunger would have emphasized low farm prices and dumping. That problem persisted for decades. as of 1990 we had just had the lowest farm prices in history, but then they went lower in the 90s, and then 1998-2005 we had the lowest prices in history.
One meaning of this is that the main problem has been low prices, not volatility. We had stable prices below full costs,( for corn, wheat, rice, cotton, soybeans, sorghum grain, barley, and oats,) for a quarter century. Even the recent so-called “record” and “skyrocketing” yearly average prices, (ie. corn, wheat, and rice, 2007-9,) when adjusted for inflation, are in the bottom 25% of all time prices (with 1 minor exception out of 9 for the 3 crops, 3 years).
From September 2005 to January 2011 the farm price of 20 pounds of wheat went up by, by my calculations, a whopping $1.35, rice went up $1.41, and corn $1.30. Previously the farm values for 20 pounds were $1.11 (wheat), 62¢ (corn) and $1.33 (rice). Here we call 20 pounds of rice 220 servings. Of course, farm rice must be hulled. Call it 141 bigger servings, and it’s a one penny increase per “serving” in the farm value of rice. Or call it 2 or 3 pennies. Why is that a crisis? Well, I guess things look very different when you’re living on less than $2/day.
A related point misrepresented here is that raising farm prices is the most effective way to stimulate wealth and jobs creation these economies, including very positive impacts for their cities. See the pdf presentation on “The Global Food Crisis” by Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Sophia Murphy. http://agpolicy.org/present/2008/DanielDTUHFBCarnegie.pdf. Clearly a return to severe export dumping where farmers in the US and in LDCs subsidize consumers, is not a solution. We already tried that for 25 years, and it didn’t work. Instead it caused the problem!
This is not to suggest that the current crisis isn’t acute. People must all be fed well. We must understand, however, that it’s a dilemma. That nearly 60 years of increasing hardship and then devastation created this savage dilemma where people are so poor that no food price levels are “affordable.”
There are important US policy tools, (not mentioned here or in most other similar articles) that we can advocate for. Most food and hunger advocates in the US and EU likely have never heard of them, although the family farm movement has fought for them for more than 50 years. They’re supported by La Via Campesina and the Africa Group at WTO, as I’ve shown in recent blogs here. These are the price floors and supply reductions as needed (bottom side of price) and price ceilings with grain reserves on the top side. See my zspace home page on these policies. They’re found today in the Food from Family Farms Act of the National Family Farm Coalition, and almost no where else in US advocacy. These policies, adequately implemented, can address low prices, volatility, and high prices.
Reply this comment
Gasoline Prices
By Donahue, Paul at Apr 24, 2011 19:13 PM
If speculators didn't raise the price of gasoline, the government would have to by taxation. It is absolutely imperitive that the price of fossil fuels begin to reflect its environmental and social impact. While I would much prefer the latter (the tax then going to social benefits and public trtansit) at this point, my view on this is "any port in a storm".
Gasoline is still a bargain in the USA compared to Europe or even Canada, where it is the equivalent of about $5 per gallon.
The common response to this viewpoint is that I am not expressing due concern to the plight of thge poor. But I have two answers to this:
1. Many of the poor in my community don't have a car anyway and are dependent on public transit - they are now facing considerable hardship from massive service cuts exactly becasue gasoline is too cheap to force the better-off "riders by choice" and their politicians, to demand better public transit funding.
2. High fuel prices cause inflation - but inflation is not a one-way street - it puts the worker in a better bargaining position (expecially if they organize) for raises.
Reply this comment