Zcom_simple

Golliner

The (unfortunate) Lies of Michael Moore (about Hugo Chávez)




Change Text Size a- | A+


In an interview last October 9th on Jimmy Kimmel Live!, the renowned and award-winning documentarian, Michael Moore lied vulgarly about his encounter with Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez during the Venice Film Festival this past September. In the interview, Moore responds to Kimmel’s request for an explanation of a photo of Moore with President Hugo Chávez. Apparently embarrased about the encounter with one of Latin America’s most prominent and influential heads of state, Moore proceed to completely make up a fairy-tale, attempting to pass it off as reality.

With a straight face, Moore stated he met President Chávez at 2 o’clock in the morning, after he and his wife had settled into bed in their Venice hotel room and heard a scandalous noise coming from the floor above. Moore states that he called down to the reception to find out “what the hell was going on”. “It’s the president of Venezuela”, the hotel clerk allegedly told Moore. Well, Michael couldn’t believe it, so despite his wife telling him “don’t go”, Moore set out, determined to find out if the true source of the scandal was really the Venezuelan president, the polemic Hugo Chávez.

Incrediously, Moore says he went upstairs and knocked right on Chávez’s door and a large man answered, who Moore claims was the president’s “bodyguard”. Chávez was right behind him and caught a glimpse of Moore and yelled out “Michael Moore, come on in!”. Anyone who has ever traveled or been close to President Chávez knows very well that it is absolutely impossible to just “go knock on his door”. Presidential security lines the hallways, elevators and all entrance points. Take it from someone who knows first hand. Moore’s story is complete and utter fiction. Also the man Moore identified in the interview as Chávez’s “bodyguard” is actually Foreign Minister Nicolás Maduro, but hey, all latinos look alike!

The tale continues. Moore says he entered the room and a “bottle and a half of tequila later”, he was writing Chávez’s speeches! Of course, Michael, all of us Latin Americans drink tequila! Man, he couldn’t even get his alcohol right in his fairy tale! Tequila is Mexican, Michael. Venezuela makes rum. Get it straight. And anyway, President Chávez does not drink at all and is well known for his anti-alcohol position. But in Moore’s story, latinos are all a bunch of partiers! No work, just party, drinks and fun at 2am!

Moore is exceptionally full of himself towards the end of the interview with Jimmy Kimmel. He says Chávez asked him for advice about his upcoming United Nations speech. Moore sternly told the South American president to “say sorry for calling Bush the devil, “el diablo”” during his last UN intervention. And to say this time around it’s all about the “hope”! Way to defend Bush, Michael! Wait, didn’t you write, direct and film Farhenheit 9/11? Right, but when someone “non-US” tells it like it is, you get way patriotic. I get it.

The interview ended with Michael fully praising himself for yet another one of President Chávez’s brilliant United Nations’ speeches. “When I heard the first few lines of his speech”, says Moore, “it was exactly what I had written for him!” Michael, Michael. Don’t you know that Chávez doesn’t use a teleprompter? Where we come from, speeches are made from the heart and soul, and not written by an elite team of 20 writers and then read from transparent screens. And Michael, do you really think that flattering yourself at this point, after you have lied so tremendously, is appropriate? Arrogantly, Moore joked that Chávez should give him a “year of free gasoline” for writing his speech. At least he didn’t say bananas.

Michael Moore has been known for his documentary work; filming and telling “facts”. But on this ocassion, Moore has turned into the worst of yellow journalists, a liar and story-teller on the big screen. Despite the fact that Moore insisted
”no cameras” document his meeting with President Chávez in Venice, the official Venezuelan presidential press snapped a few photos, and there were many witnesses. The photographs evidence a Michael Moore and a President Chávez serenly sitting in two chairs talking. No tequila, no parties, no scandals, just a normal meeting between a head of state and an invited guest. In fact, the real meeting lasted three hours, without tequila.

Michael Moore prohibited cameras in the meeting because, per his own words, it wasn’t “convenient” for him to been seen with Chávez. Despite the fact that every presidential meeting has been documented by the official press, this time, they defered to Moore with respect. He was, after all, an admired figure by millions of Venezuela. But, the presidential press was able to capture a few photos of the encounter. These photos now are the key evidence to expose Michael Moore’s vulgar lies about his meeting with President Chávez.

Moore’s comentaries about President Chávez asking him to “help” write his United Nations speech demonstrate Moore’s extreme ego. President Chávez is one of the most brilliant speakers in the world, with an immense capacity to bring together a variety of ideas while being coherent. Of course, Chávez nourishes his speeches and talks with ideas, experiencies and the writings of many, but for those of us who spend almost every day listening and watching President Chávez, we know that nobody writes his speeches, not even him! He speaks from his heart, and not from a teleprompter!

Moore’s declarations against President Chávez are offensive and insulting and a clear sign of his hipocresy and lack of ethic. How many times has we heard President Chávez acclaim Moore’s books and documentaries? And most recently, Chávez announced that Moore’s latest documentary, “Capitalism, a love story”, would premiere here in Venezuela.

Moore’s response to this admiration, acclaim and support is to lie and ridicule President Chávez and the people of Venezuela, and to attempt, lamely, to justify his meeting with Chávez. Because in the end, this whole ridiculous tale told by Moore about his “meeting” with President Chávez is an attempt to avoid admitting before the US media that he met for three hours with the South American “dictator”. And he probably learned a lot, and liked it!

Michael Moore is a most unfortunate coward.

(See the videoclip here)

Person

Re: The (unfortunate) Lies of Michael Moore (about Hugo Chávez)

By Steinberg, Henry at Nov 13, 2009 14:06 PM

This is a really bad article, and I can't believe it made it's way onto Znet. Eva, stop obsessively searching for racism where it plainly doesn't exist. You shouldn't be writing things.

Reply this comment


1

Re: The (unfortunate) Lies of Michael Moore (about Hugo Chávez)

By Albert, Michael at Oct 23, 2009 06:06 AM

While I think perhaps Eva Gollinger could have given the benefit of the doubt to Moore, and thus assumed, unless he explicitly said otherwise, that Moore was joking, or trying to joke, rather than aggrandizing himself at others' expense - I saw the TV exchange itself, and it was done in such a manner, I agree with Eva, that a typical viewer would assume it was Moore describing actual events. I have to admit, that I even took it that way, wondering why he would do that. When I thought a bit more, I knew it had to be either a gross exaggeration or outright lie, or a bid at humor. But the knowledge that makes what Moore said obviously false is not generally known and does not occur to one while listening to him, in any case. After the anecdote, Moore never said anything or even used any mannerisms I saw, to clearly convey that he was joking about the events - nor did he, to conclude the section, say, anything clarifying his overall meaning or views, etc.

I thought that absense was unfortunate, even assuming Moore never intended for people to believe his story, only to laugh at it. And I think while Moore should not at all curb being funny, he should take more care to be sure that his audience knows when he is telling tall tales for humor...especially when dealing with other people's integrity, important current events, etc.

I actually had a somewhat similar experience not long ago. In Venezuela, giving a talk to an audience of members of a local assembly, I told a story of my experience with some exchanges with government officials about populat power. The story was revealing and also very very positive about events unfolding in Venezuela, and Bolivarian aims, with nothing the slightest distorted or which, on hearing the whole talk could possibly be misinterpreted - but - the event was attended by tv folks, etc. and it was possible, given my choice of words and style, to take a snippet of video of me and have it convey the opposite of my intentended meaning - manipulatively taking irony for reality.

After the talk Eva - yes the same author - called me on my words and quite forcefully explained how common place it was for Venezuelan media to do just that kind of distorting to besmirch Chavez and the revolution, and how encumbant on people it was, therefore, even at the cost of some humor, or drama, or power, in a talk, to guard against providing snippets media could misuse.

I thought she was right, and that I was wrong, and I tried hard, thereafter, to be aware of the kind of misuse that might take advantage of my words. So, okay, what's the point?

The point is the real indicator of Moore's original intention and purpose, and of his take on such matters more broadly, will not be the initial TV exchange, which was at best a poorly executed bit of humor, but Moore's reaction to Gollinger's comments, even if he thinks her comments were unecessarily sharp and lacking awareness of his real humor motive. So, has anyone seen any reply or reaction from him?

 

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

583170

Re:

By Mccormick, Duane at Oct 25, 2009 02:41 AM

I've been looking, but haven't found a response from Michael Moore so far (10/25/09).  Does he read ZNet or Eva Golinger?

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

583170

Re: Re:

By Mccormick, Duane at Nov 08, 2009 04:06 AM

More of Moore and Golinger:

 

http://www.chavezcode.com/2009/10/moore-saga.html

Reply this comment


187647_730172866_4211116_n

Re: The (unfortunate) Lies of Michael Moore (about Hugo Chávez)

By Moorey, Crip at Oct 22, 2009 09:29 AM

"Eva - you have misunderstood - Moore is joking! Agree with Monti - this should not be on Znet"

What he said.

Reply this comment


Pink

Re: The (unfortunate) Lies of Michael Moore (about Hugo Chávez)

By Tadjpour, Layla at Oct 22, 2009 08:45 AM

I agree with previous comment. It seems obvious that Moore was joking in the comedy talk show interview!

Reply this comment


Person

Re: The (unfortunate) Lies of Michael Moore (about Hugo Chávez)

By Rochat, Gui at Oct 22, 2009 07:21 AM

Yes, Moore is offensive, but being after all a clod Americano del Norte, what can one expect ?

Reply this comment


Person

Re: The (unfortunate) Lies of Michael Moore (about Hugo Chávez)

By Hurrell, Peter at Oct 22, 2009 04:29 AM

Eva - you have misunderstood - Moore is joking!

Agree with Monti - this should not be on Znet.

Reply this comment


583197

Znet or Us?

By Monti, Stefano at Oct 22, 2009 04:18 AM

Sorry but I feel this article belongs in Us magazine (ok, a lefty version of Us magazine), not in ZNet. Please, drop the gossips and the name-calling.

Reply this comment

Loading_border