Zcom_simple




43

This is Your Nation on White Privilege




Change Text Size a- | A+


For those who still can't grasp the concept of white privilege, or who are constantly looking for some easy-to-understand examples of it, perhaps this list will help.

  • White privilege is when you can get pregnant at seventeen like Bristol Palin and everyone is quick to insist that your life and that of your family is a personal matter, and that no one has a right to judge you or your parents, because "every family has challenges," even as black and Latino families with similar "challenges" are regularly typified as irresponsible, pathological and arbiters of social decay.
  • White privilege is when you can call yourself a "fuckin' redneck," like Bristol Palin's boyfriend does, and talk about how if anyone messes with you, you'll "kick their fuckin' ass," and talk about how you like to "shoot shit" for fun, and still be viewed as a responsible, all-American boy (and a great son-in-law to be) rather than a thug.
  • White privilege is when you can attend four different colleges in six years like Sarah Palin did (one of which you basically failed out of, then returned to after making up some coursework at a community college), and no one questions your intelligence or commitment to achievement, whereas a person of color who did this would be viewed as unfit for college, and probably someone who only got in in the first place because of affirmative action.
  • White privilege is when you can claim that being mayor of a town smaller than most medium-sized colleges, and then Governor of a state with about the same number of people as the lower fifth of the island of Manhattan, makes you ready to potentially be president, and people don't all piss on themselves with laughter, while being a black U.S. Senator, two-term state Senator, and constitutional law scholar, means you're "untested."
  • White privilege is being able to say that you support the words "under God" in the pledge of allegiance because "if it was good enough for the founding fathers, it's good enough for me," and not be immediately disqualified from holding office--since, after all, the pledge was written in the late 1800s and the "under God" part wasn't added until the 1950s--while believing that reading accused criminals and terrorists their rights (because, ya know, the Constitution, which you used to teach at a prestigious law school requires it), is a dangerous and silly idea only supported by mushy liberals.
  • White privilege is being able to be a gun enthusiast and not make people immediately scared of you. White privilege is being able to have a husband who was a member of an extremist political party that wants your state to secede from the Union, and whose motto was "Alaska first," and no one questions your patriotism or that of your family, while if you're black and your spouse merely fails to come to a 9/11 memorial so she can be home with her kids on the first day of school, people immediately think she's being disrespectful.
  • White privilege is being able to make fun of community organizers and the work they do--like, among other things, fight for the right of women to vote, or for civil rights, or the 8-hour workday, or an end to child labor--and people think you're being pithy and tough, but if you merely question the experience of a small town mayor and 18-month governor with no foreign policy expertise beyond a class she took in college--you're somehow being mean, or even sexist.
  • White privilege is being able to convince white women who don't even agree with you on any substantive issue to vote for you and your running mate anyway, because all of a sudden your presence on the ticket has inspired confidence in these same white women, and made them give your party a "second look."
  • White privilege is being able to fire people who didn't support your political campaigns and not be accused of abusing your power or being a typical politician who engages in favoritism, while being black and merely knowing some folks from the old-line political machines in Chicago means you must be corrupt.
  • White privilege is being able to attend churches over the years whose pastors say that people who voted for John Kerry or merely criticize George W. Bush are going to hell, and that the U.S. is an explicitly Christian nation and the job of Christians is to bring Christian theological principles into government, and who bring in speakers who say the conflict in the Middle East is God's punishment on Jews for rejecting Jesus, and everyone can still think you're just a good church-going Christian, but if you're black and friends with a black pastor who has noted (as have Colin Powell and the U.S. Department of Defense) that terrorist attacks are often the result of U.S. foreign policy and who talks about the history of racism and its effect on black people, you're an extremist who probably hates America.
  • White privilege is not knowing what the Bush Doctrine is when asked by a reporter, and then people get angry at the reporter for asking you such a "trick question," while being black and merely refusing to give one-word answers to the queries of Bill O'Reilly means you're dodging the question, or trying to seem overly intellectual and nuanced.
  • White privilege is being able to claim your experience as a POW has anything at all to do with your fitness for president, while being black and experiencing racism is, as Sarah Palin has referred to it a "light" burden.
  • And finally, white privilege is the only thing that could possibly allow someone to become president when he has voted with George W. Bush 90 percent of the time, even as unemployment is skyrocketing, people are losing their homes, inflation is rising, and the U.S. is increasingly isolated from world opinion, just because white voters aren't sure about that whole "change" thing. Ya know, it's just too vague and ill-defined, unlike, say, four more years of the same, which is very concrete and certain.


White privilege is, in short, the problem.

Tim Wise is the author of White Like Me (Soft Skull, 2005, revised 2008), and of Speaking Treason Fluently, publishing this month, also by Soft Skull. For review copies or interview requests, please reply to publicity@softskull.com

Person

Palin-my worst nightmare

By Michel, Teah at Sep 13, 2008 19:33 PM

What a spot on article. I dread seeing Palin on the ticket. I was very anti-Hillary for a host of reasons, none of which had to do with her gender. I spent a lot of time defending my decision to not support her simply because she\'s female. Trust me, there is nothing more I would love to see than a female president, but the problem is that if she\'s not the right person for the job based on her politics then I\'m not going to vote for her. Just as democrats shouldn\'t automatically expect my vote simply because they are Democrats, females should not expect my vote simply because I\'m female. 

Obama is no longer a better choice but that\'s probably another post.

Palin is far worse than Clinton in so many ways. You have framed why she can get away with this perfectly in this article. Any substantial criticism of her is going to be relegated to the sexist category. I\'m not a sexist, I\'m female for cryin out loud and Palin is a nightmare come true.

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

Person

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Wilson-pant, Calanthe at Mar 03, 2009 21:44 PM

This article is merely the covering of judgmentalism about lifestyle and belief with a reverse accusation. Because the judged is white--Palin----and is "getting away" with something that the writer feels is "not appropriate," he is rationalizing that it is white privilege that allows her to get away with that which he deems as unacceptable. It is not that there is white privilege, but that there is liberal elitism that would only accept an African-American candidate who does not have the "baggage" that Sarah Palin has. There have been many African-Americans who could have been nominated by either party before now, but this elitism that requires membership in the northeastern educational system, and belief system would not allow it. It is not confined to Democrats or Republicans--it is the bias of the financially powerful.  One reason that McCain was not nominated earlier--instead it brought us George Bush--he ahd the "right credentials" Is it right? No, but not because it is white privilege, but because it is snobbery. 

Reply this comment


Person

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Sherrill, Ken at Sep 14, 2008 20:53 PM

Tim Wise has poorly stated the obvious. First and foremost, many of the paragraphs in this article can be paraphrased to \"White priveledge is something that does not exist.\" As an example, Tim claims, \"White privilege is when you can get pregnant at seventeen like Bristol Palin and everyone is quick to insist that your life and that of your family is a personal matter.\" That hasn\'t happened. Have some people insisted this? Sure. But since we\'ve all heard about the affair, those insistant \'some\' are clearly overpowered by those who disagree. That said, the first similie used to explain White Priveledge, is to a nonexistant phenomenon. Tim Wise is accurate certainly that there are aspects of Sarah Palin that afford her priveledge in the matters mentioned. This is completely obvious. To argue that her priveledge stems solely from the color of her skin is purely ludicrious. In some cases it is ludicrous to argue that her color has any bearing on the issue at all. --- \"And finally, white privilege is the only thing that could possibly allow someone to become president ... just because white voters aren\'t sure about that whole \"change\" thing.\" To argue that white voters are the ones who would be solely responsible for McCain/Palin\'s election is obtuse at best. For starters, look at New England and the West Coast. Excluding California, these are states where white citizens represent the majority, and states which are slated to vote Obama in 2008. This runs contrary to the notion that this is a racial issues. It runs against the argument that whites are uniting to support a white candidate. Secondly, to put all white Americans together as a single demographic fails to acknowledge that there are two distinct demographics within the white population of America: Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Whites. These two demographics are different traditionally, culturally and racially. Their voting trends are also different. Why is this important? Simple. The \"whites\" That Tim Wise refers to consistantly throughout his article are non-Hispanic whites, and non-Hispanic whites are *not* the majority of the population in some states slated to vote McCain. Texas is one example. We can see from this that it is not only white votes that Obama has difficulty recruiting. Hispanic votes, too, are eluding him. It is not simply the white voting population that stands for Palin, or against Obama. If it were, we would see major \'Red\' states going \'Blue\'. Hopefully that isn\'t news to Tim Wise. Furthermore, even though Tim Wise has been accurate in many places of pointing out Palin\'s priveledge as an advantage, he is incorrect in citing it as the advantage here. The advantage Palin has here is that she is running on the Republican ticket. Many, many poor and working Americans have voted and will continue to vote for Republican government that harms them. They vote for failed practices such as \"trickle-down economics\". They vote to put more money and power into the hands of the priveledged rich. This is not because of whiteness. This is not because of priveledge. This is because of obtuse, near-sighted ignorance. Ignorance not terribly unlike that responsible for the inadequacies and innacuracies of this article. All this said, I support Obama for president in 2008. McCain represents, as I have written, a continued of failed and/or deceitful economic practices. McCain represents war. McCain represents American poverty and America\'s foreign political failure. It is disturbing to me that Sarah Palin is an appealing candidate to so many Americans. Whether on the basis of her stature, her culture, her age, her sex, her physical appeal or her color, it is disturbing. But I am not so foolish as to chalk this phenomenon up to her color alone. To do so would be to ignore the greater portion of the problem. In so doing, I would be underestimating the hurdles that must be overcome before Palin becomes un-electable. In so doing, I would be hurting the chances we have of electing a better candidate to office in November. This is my problem with Tim Wises article. In being so obtuse, so short sited and so sadly racist, it represents a detriment to the cause of electing Barack Obama. It represents a detriment to the very cause it seems to support. Demographics Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_demographics_of_the_United_States#Racial_makeup_of_the_U.S._population P.S. One last nitpick: being female doesn\'t prevent you from being sexist against women, any more than being white prevents you from being racist against whites. I don\'t believe Leah Phillips to be a closet sexist, I\'m just pointing it out. P.P.S. Long post, I know. Tried to proofread it, likely missed something.

Reply this comment


Person

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Twist, Oliver at Sep 15, 2008 22:31 PM

I am watching cnn and seeing new voters excited about sarah palin but completely ignoring the facts revealed everyday from her abuse of power to outright lies on the campaign trail. all i can say is that white racism has come out in a new and modern way, simply blind to the decline of the great usa as we witness today.

Reply this comment


Person

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Lee, Robert at Sep 17, 2008 09:02 AM

For those of you who now understand what white privilege is, but can’t seem to have the competing concept of black privilege, perhaps this list will help to. - You’re the beneficiary of government policies which specifically use a race as a deciding factor at the same time you decry the horrible impact of racism in America (which is nothing to joke about – it is horrible). The hypocrisy in such a statement isn’t questioned because those white folk just don’t seem to get how horrible it is to be hated for an immutable characteristic. - You’re the product of a political machine historically controlled by one of the most prominent Democratic families in America, but get to consistently usher in an era of “change we can believe in.” Nobody questions the fact that the community and city in which you come from still has some of the most rampant government corruption and waste in America, much as it was before you came, and much as it was long after you left. - You’re able to realistically claim that you have more executive experience than a vice presidential candidate because you’ve been running for President for the last 18 months (according to the official reports), and de facto since the 2004 DNC keynote address. After all, running a campaign that spends hundreds of millions of dollars donated by the intrepid bastion of critical thought, Hollywood, is always more preparatory for public office than serving as an executive in a city and state government. - You’re able to claim that you’re going to Washington to change the culture of bi-partisan bickering, but have one of the most liberal voting records compared to the other 99 men and women there, voted hundreds of times to merely be “present” when in a position of trust in your home state’s senate, and have direct fundraising ties to slum lords like Tony Rezko. I doubt that anyone will bring up the fact that you never once challenged the corruption of Democratic circles and patronage in the City of Chicago. Nor do I believe anyone will acknowledge the role your opponent\'s ticket-mate may have played in battling the corruption in her own party. - You’re able to speak about the clouds opening up and granting everyone the epiphany they need to realize that voting for you is Godly and holy, but a vice presidential candidate that says students and teachers should have the academic freedom to question evolutionary facts and discussions in class is somehow a religious zealot. - You’re able to claim that you want to end the ways of a wasteful government, but compared to your opponent – who doesn’t request special pet projects in the federal budget – you’ve made an attempt to bilk American taxpayers for hundreds of millions of dollars to consolidate your political position. - And finally, of course, you can realistically talk about race and politics and be given credibility simply because you’re someone who’s not white and can speak very well. However, individuals (white individuals – I should be specific) who question your assumptions about race and politics, and offer alternatives that they feel are better at bridging the gap between racial disagreements, are labeled as racist. No discussion. No attempt at understanding. Just, racist. *** …the fact remains, Mr. Wise, that this isn’t a diatribe about the role that race plays in this campaign – it’s a slanderous, speculative hit piece on presidential and vice presidential candidates that you fear. You undoubtedly are aware of Palin’s role in the campaign, and the star power that she – as a young, vibrant public figure like Barack Obama – has in front of the American public, a star power that previously had been monopolized by Barack Obama. Additionally, you can’t deny the important steps McCain has taken in standing up for what he thinks is right, so you play spin like Rove to try and paint McCain as a Bush lackey in a feeble attempt to make this election a referendum on Bush instead of a progressive attempt to improve our country. You try and create this dissonance in your supportive reader’s (yes – I placed that apostrophe where I did for a reason) mind that says you either vote Barack Obama and stand up for humanity or vote for John McCain and become a despicable human being… …buck up though, buddy. You’ll have four more years to sit and stew over a Republican administration, and write another article on sexism when Madame Clinton is the candidate in 2012.

Reply this comment


Person

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Lawson, Gael at Sep 20, 2008 08:08 AM

Show us some deeds!!! We have some problems with Obama quoting us Bible verses about caring for the least of them, when he feels that the need to support a woman\'s choice to kill her own offspring in the womb is more important than that very offspring, even if the child makes it out of the womb before it is destroyed. (And why is it that we women are supposed to see this --the opportunity to abort-- as our primary political interest? The Bible calls children a reward, yet we are supposed to rally around the right to dispose of inconvenient ones? And I have personally seen many \"inconvenient\" babies become blessings.) He called on his followers to take care of their brothers, but ignores his own. And how are we to view a man who\'s so verbally passionate about helping the least of them when he gives away only a pittance of his own money to charities? Is he only interested in giving away OUR money? John and Cindy McCain put him to shame. Margaret Thatcher once said that the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people\'s money to give away. Integrity issues: Todd Palin quit his job when his wife became governor in order to avoid a conflict of interest situation. Michelle Obama keeps her hospital job, where her salary balloons, and her husband delivers a million dollars to the hospital after he is elected a Senator. It\'s nice to see people helping each other!

Reply this comment


Selfportrait_color_drawing_2-24-2010_sanda_aronson

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Aronson, Sanda at Sep 20, 2008 14:41 PM

I think you should continue to explain \"Obama is no longer a better choice...\". I disagree.

Reply this comment


Selfportrait_color_drawing_2-24-2010_sanda_aronson

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Aronson, Sanda at Sep 20, 2008 14:42 PM

I think you should continue to explain \"Obama is no longer a better choice...\". I disagree.

Reply this comment


Person

Re: White Priviledge

By Grandy, Debra at Oct 22, 2008 06:27 AM

This article could not be more on point. I think as Americans we believe our own deceptions that life here for minorities has gotten better, whatever. I think it will be a cold day in hell should Obama win, I think Americans will endure and suffer another 4 years before the see a minority a black man in the white house.

Reply this comment


Person

Re: Palin-my worst nightmare

By Adams, Matthew at Nov 19, 2008 13:13 PM

OK, so white privilege beats black privilege, but I think it's a bit rich (get it) to go on about white privilege when the vast majority of white people are far less privileged than Obama. To outsiders, white privilege is a strange American concept that looks like it is designed to avoid talking about wealth and power. I don't deny its existence, but I believe any progressives expecting more than cosmetic changes from Obama will be rather disappointed - and that in itself shows the root of power lies in money, not social categories

Reply this comment

Loading_border