Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

This Just In!

By Michael McGehee at Jan 28, 2008


Change Text Size a- | A+

Caroline Kennedy: Obama offers 'same sense of hope' as JFK

Wait a minute. JFK wouldn't even meet with MLK untill it was obvious the civil rights movement was going to be successful; he escalated the war in Vietnam by bombing the south; he was behind the Bay of Pigs invasion and numerous other terrorist operations against Castro and Cuba; he almost got the world blown up during this misnomer, Cuban Missile Crisis; also, Latin America might have some more to say on his policies; and so on.

So what "hope" is she talking about?

1

By Albert, Michael at Jan 30, 2008 08:15 AM

Hi, Michael...welcome aboard.

Perhaps Caroline is right - that is, perhaps obama offers precisely the same sense of hope - and absense of real hope, as Kennedy - of course not her intended meaning.

Back then, it was interesting. Kennedy did inspire a huge upsurge of compassion and desire - not his intent, but he did - and a lot of that did actually, I think, percolate over into the emergence of social movements that of course went beyond anything he or any democrat at all has in mind...in the sixties.

I was, for example, as a little guy, inspired by kennedy\'s words and demeanor, youth, etc. - though I, like almost all others, knew nothing of his real policies, of course. Later, I suspect, masny others experienced radicalization via feelings of horror at hypocrisy, like I did.

The main difference now, I suspect, is that if obama were elected, and six months down the road all the hype and hope were extinguished by his actual actions, those who had been excited wouldn\'t become angry and further activated, but would just return to cynicism with the obama experience verifying their prior view - nothing is worthy or possible.

That\'s a very big difference between then and now. Kennedy mattered becuase arousing folks just based on charisma, etc. etc. mattered in that when the truth became evident we got angry, or many of his did, and we went further, not backward.

We can hope something similar happens again, but I suspect the time for that kind of radicalization at lies, etc., is past. People now are just too cynical and too knowledgeable to get upset by lies much less retain forward momentum just based on that anger. If people let themselves get excited by someone, obama, say, that is the abberation, and when they are let down, they won\'t move forward, but back.

What people need to get excited by, I suspect, if they are o become lasting fighters for change regardless of lies anyone might be telling, or bad policies, and so on, is vision and strategy - a view of the possibility of better relations and the road to them...

What do you think?

Reply this comment

Loading_border