Zcom_simple

Golliner

Venezuela: A Threat to Washington?




Change Text Size a- | A+


From the first time Hugo Chavez was elected President of Venezuela in 1998, Washington and its allies have been trying to undermine his government. When Chavez was just a presidential candidate, the US State Department denied his visa to participate in television interviews in Miami. Later, when he won the presidential elections, Ambassador John Maisto called him personally to congratulate him and offer him a visa. The following months were filled with attempts to “buy” the newly elected President of Venezuela. Businessmen, politicians and heads of state from Washington and Spain pressured him to submit to their agendas. “Come with us”, urged Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, trying to seduce him with offers of wealth and luxury in turn for obeying orders.

 

When Chavez refused to be bought, he was ousted in a coup d’etat April 11, 2002, funded and planned by Washington. When the coup failed and Chavez’s supporters rescued their democracy and president in less than 48 hours, attempts to destabilize his government continued. “We must make it difficult for him to govern”, said former US State Department chief Lawrence Eagleberger.

 

Soon, Venezuela was overrun with economic sabotage, oil industry strikes, chaos in the streets and a brutal media war that distorted the reality of the country on a national and international level. A plan to assassinate Chavez with Colombian paramilitaries in May 2004 was impeded by state security forces. Months later, the US-backed opposition tried to revoke his mandate in a recall referendum, but again, the people saved him in a 60-40 landslide victory.

 

The more popular Chavez became, the more millions of dollars flowed from US agencies to anti-Chavez groups to destabilize, descredit, delegitimize, overthrow, assassinate or remove him from power by any means possible. In December 2006, Chavez was reelected president with 64% of the vote. His approval rating grew in Venezuela and throughout Latin America. New governments in Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Uruguay and several Caribbean nations joined regional initiatives of integration, cooperation, sovereignty and unity, encouraged by Caracas. Washington began to lose its influence and control over its former “backyard”.  

 

The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our Americas (ALBA), the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), PetroCaribe, PetroSur, TeleSUR, Bank of ALBA, Bank of the South and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) were created. Washington isn’t included in any of these organizations, nor is the elite that previously dominated the region.

 

In January 2005, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Chavez was a “negative force” in the region. In March, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) placed Venezuela on their list of “Top 5 Hot Spots”. A few months later, Reverend Pat Robertson publicly called for the assassination of Chavez, claiming it would cost less than “a $2 billion war”. That same year, when Venezuela suspended cooperation with the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) because it was found committing acts of espionage and sabotage, Washington classified Venezuela as a nation “not cooperating with counter-narcotics” efforts. No evidence was presented to show alleged Venezuelan government ties to drug trafficking.

 

In February 2006, Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte referred to Venezuela as a “dangerous threat” to the US. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfled compared Chavez to Hitler. That same year, Washington created a special intelligence mission dedicated to Venezuela and Cuba, increasing resources for operations against them. In June 2006, the White House placed Venezuela on a list of countries “not cooperating sufficiently with the war on terror”. The classification included a sanction prohibiting the sale of military and defense equipment from the US and US companies or those using US technology to Venezuela. No evidence was ever shown to back such serious claims.

 

In 2008, the Pentagon reactivated its Fourth Fleet, the regional command in charge of Latin America and the Caribbean. It had been deactivated in 1950 and hadn’t functioned since then, until Washington decided it was necessary to increase its presence and “force” in the region. In 2010, the US established an agreement with Colombia to set up 7 military bases in its territory. An official US Air Force document justified the budget increase for these bases in order to counter the “threat from anti-American governments in the region”.

 

International media call Chavez a dictator, tyrant, authoritarian, narco, anti-American, terrorist, but they never present proof for such dangerous titles. They have converted the image of Venezuela into violence, insecurity, crime, corruption and chaos, failing to mention the incredible achievements and social advances during the last decade, or the causes of the social inequalities left behind from previous governments.

 

For years, a group of US congressmembers - democrats and republicans - have tried to place Venezuela on their list of “state sponors of terrorism”. They claim the relationships between Venezuela and Iran, Venezuela and Cuba, and even Venezuela and China evidence the “grave threat” represented by the South American nation to Washington.

 

They say again and again that Venezuela and Chavez are threats to the US. “He must be stopped”, they say, before he “launches Iranian bombs against us”.

 

In an interview a few days ago, President Barack Obama said Chavez was not a threat to US security. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said he was. The ire of the Miami Cuban-Venezuelan community came down upon Obama. But they shouldn’t worry, because Obama increased funding to anti-Chavez groups this year. More than $20 million in US taxpayer dollars have been channelled from US agencies to help fund the opposition’s campaign in Venezuela.

 

Is Venezuela a threat to Washington? In Venezuela, the only “terrorists” are the groups trying to destabilize the country, the majority with political and financial support from the US. The drug traffickers are in Colombia, where the production and transit of drugs has increased during the US invasion disguised as Plan Colombia. Relations with Iran, Cuba, China, Russia and the rest of the world are normal bilateral – and multilateral – ties between countries. There are no bombs, no attack plans, no sinister secrets. 

 

No, Venezuela is not that kind of threat to Washington.

 

Poverty has been reduced by more than 50% since Chavez came to power in 1998. The inclusionary policies of his government have created a society with mass participation in economic, political and social decisions. His social programs – called missions – have guaranteed free medical care and education, from basic to advanced levels, and provided basic food items at affordable costs, along with tools to create and maintain cooperatives, small and medium businesses, community organizations and communes. Venezuelan culture has been rescued and treasured, recovering national pride and identity, and creating a sentiment of dignity instead of inferiority. Communication media have proliferated during the last decade, assuring spaces for the expression of all.

 

The oil industry, nationalized in 1976 but operating as a private company, has been recuperated for the benefit of the country, and not for multinationals and the elite. Over 60% of the annual budget is dedicated to social programs in the country, with the principal focus on eradicating poverty.

 

Caracas, the capital, has been beautified. Parks and plazas have turned into spaces for gatherings, enjoyment and safety for visitors. There’s music in the streets, art on the walls and a rich debate of ideas amongst inhabitants. The new communal police works with neighborhoods to battle crime and violence, addressing problems from the root cause.

 

The awakening in Venezuela has expanded throughout the continent and northward into the Caribbean. The sensation of sovereignty, independence and union in the region has buried the shadow of subdevelopment and subordination imposed by colonial powers during centuries past.

 

No, Venezuela is not a threat to US security. Venezuela is an example of how a rising people, facing the most difficult obstacles and the brutal force of empire, can build a model where social justice reigns, and human prosperity is cherished above economic wealth. Venezuela is a country where millions once invisible are today, visible. Today they have a voice and the power to decide the future of their country, without being strangled by foreign hands. Today, thanks to the revolution led by President Chavez, Venezuela is one of the happiest countries in the world.

 

That is the threat Chavez and Venezuela represent to Washington: The threat of a good example.

  

585425

Rival Trying to Destabilize Venezuela

By Tatsuo, Miyachi at Jul 22, 2012 08:00 AM

Chavez: Rival Trying to Destabilize Venezuela

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — President Hugo Chavez and his allies accused opposition presidential candidate Henrique Capriles on Sunday of trying to provoke violence by campaigning in areas that have been bastions of support for the incumbent leader.

Chavez accused Capriles of trying to spur violence as part of a broader plan aimed at creating widespread political upheaval ahead of Venezuela's looming Oct. 7 presidential election.

"They are going to try to destabilize the country. I've been saying it and everybody should be alert," said Chavez, speaking to soldiers during a ceremony to promote military officers.

The socialist leader spoke after a scuffle Saturday involving stone-throwing Chavistas and opposition sympathizers who joined Capriles as he led a march in the poor Caracas district of La Vega. Police forced him to turn back without completing the march.

"Yesterday, for example, a very lamentable incident occurred. But it's evidence of this plan," Chavez said, speaking in front of hundreds of uniformed soldiers at Venezuela's largest military fort. "We must neutralize the destabilization plans."

Pro-Chavez lawmaker Juan Carlos Aleman echoed the president's accusations.

Capriles demonstrated "an irresponsible attitude by staging an event in a neighborhood that backs President Chavez," said Aleman.

Capriles called for calm and attempted to avoid any violence amid the tussle, which police broke up before violence escalated. No major injuries were reported.

"I'm not walking Venezuela's streets to fight with anybody," Capriles said. It was not the candidate's first foray into a Chavez bastion.

So far, campaigning ahead of an Oct. 7 presidential vote has mostly been peaceful, but observers warn the deep political polarization and rising tensions between allies and adversaries of Chavez could boil over, making for a potentially violent campaign.

"There is a risk that minor clashes between supporters of both camps could escalate and threaten social peace. The distrust is profound, and arms are plentiful," said Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank in Washington. "It is likely that cooler heads will prevail and the violence will be kept in check, but that is far from assured."

Capriles is seeking to shore up support from working-class and poor Venezuelans, which make up most of the country's 19 million voters.

Chavez denied that he's attempting to undermine Capriles' efforts to make inroads in poverty-stricken barrios.

"There has never been so much freedom in this country to exercise politics," he said.

Chavez, a former paratroop commander, noted that he has barely begun campaigning because he's still recovering from cancer treatment and attending day-to-day duties as president, but he expressed optimism that he'd defeat Capriles at the polls.

Over the past 13 months, Chavez has undergone two surgeries that removed tumors from his pelvic region, most recently in February. Chavez he has not disclosed key details about his illness including the type of cancer he's fighting or the precise location of the tumors.

Following his cancer treatments, Chavez has appeared in public less frequently, preferring to address Venezuelans during marathon speeches broadcast on television and radio.

"I'm sure we are going to win the election. Of course, we have to work hard," he said.

Capriles' campaign manager, Armando Briquet, called on the National Electoral Council to send representatives to the area.

Election officials have not yet responded to the request.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/07/08/world/americas/ap-lt-venezuela-campaign-violence.html?ref=americas&pagewanted=print

Such oppresion againt oppositon is threat to domestic?
This is mirror of oppressive diplomacy policy such as suppport of Syria

Reply this comment


585425

How Chavez Has Crushed Venezuela's Private Media

By Tatsuo, Miyachi at Jul 22, 2012 07:56 AM

FRANCISCO TORO-How Chavez Has Crushed Venezuela's Private Media - NYTimes.com

MONTREAL - Sometimes on road trips in Venezuela, I like to play a little game I call "find a sane radio station." The rules are simple: I keep pressing the "seek" button on the tuner until I land on a station that broadcasts even a smidgeon of criticism of the government.

As the years wear on, it takes longer and longer to win. With enough patience, in Caracas and other large cities, you eventually do. But drive to the smaller towns and cities where most Venezuelans live, and you find yourself playing for hours on end. It's not, to tell the truth, a very fun game.

This is the world of President Hugo Chávez's "communication hegemony." Starting in 2007 the Venezuelan government decided to do something about the country's raucous private media, which for years had put up a robust challenge against what many of us saw as the government's rising authoritarianism.

To some extent, you could almost sympathize with Chávez. Particularly during the hyper-confrontational, coup-strewn years of 2001-04, Venezuela's private media often went over the top. For a two-month stretch in December 2002 and January 2003, private television stations joined a general strike, and the opposition media ran hardcore anti-Chávez propaganda around the clock, forfeiting their journalistic obligations almost completely. For those of us who were concerned about the integrity of journalism in Venezuela, it was painful to watch.

The government's solution to the problem was not to nurture a non-partisan media that might elevate the level of discussion in Venezuela's fledgling public sphere. It was to supplant unhinged antigovernment propaganda with extremist propaganda of its own and use the power of the state to keep dissenting voices off the air for good.

Over the last five years, the government has expanded its media footprint from a single national TV channel and a single radio network to a vast broadcast operation, including six nationwide TV networks, an international news channel, a news agency, three newspapers, four radio networks, 36 "community" TV channels and 244 "community" radio stations - "community" being a euphemism for local but government-financed and -controlled.

The government has also gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure that alternative voices can't be heard. In 2007, it took the unprecedented step of refusing a broadcast license to the country's most popular TV station after the station's management refused to muzzle itself. In July 2009, it shut down 34 radio stations that had dared question the government's propaganda line.

New laws with nebulous definitions now ban entire categories of speech - like messages that "could sow panic" in the population - but are used only to sanction news outlets that are too critical of the government.

As recently as 2008, Human Rights Watch was saying that Venezuela enjoyed "vibrant public debate in which anti-government and pro-government media are equally vocal in their criticism and defense of Chávez." But in a new report, the organization details just how far the government has gone toward freezing dissent.

The results are depressing. After one broadcaster was fined over $2 million for reporting live from the site of a bloody prison riot, there seems to have been no further live reporting on the country's chronic prison crisis. And what about investigations into corruption by high-ranking officials? No sane editor would even think of it. These days, if a private station wants to have any staying power, it sticks to music, relationship advice or sports.

Venezuela's broadcast media today is a wall of breathless pro-government propaganda, punctuated now and again by a baseball game or salsa tunes. No wonder my little road-trip game lasts longer and longer.

http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/19/how-chavez-has-crushed-venezuelas-private-media/?pagewanted=print

Such crackdown on media is threat to Human rigtht in Venezuela?If not threat to washington?

Reply this comment


Gary_004_small_portrait

Typical of Obama

By Techentien, Gary at Jul 21, 2012 01:36 AM

Our president, in trademark style, makes a proclamation that makes my heart leap:  "Chavez is not a threat to the U.S." but all the while behind his back he continues shoveling the money to the people who used it to work Chavez's undoing.  Nothing has changed since 1980.  Sometimes I don't know what's worse, a Reagan that tells you the murdering Contras are "freedom fighters" or an Obama who promises "hope for change" and governs like a Bush?

Reply this comment

Loading_border