Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

108

Charley Earp's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/charleyearp
Bio:  Utopian Longings   Charley's Brief Autobiography   For some reason, I always go back to the year of my birth, as if that explains something about my adult self. Nineteen sixty-t... (More)

All Earp Blogs

Voting Green for a Better Future!

By Charley Earp at Nov 01, 2010


Change Text Size a- | A+

Voting Green for a Better Future!

November 1, 2010radicalprogressEditLeave a comment
Come Tuesday, I will mostly be voting for Green Party candidates. There’s one race where the Democrat, Jan Schakowsky, is more progressive than the Green (who should probably run as a Libertarian), and there I may split my ticket. I get heat from my liberal friends for “spoiling” the Democrats, and from the Left for falling into “electoralism” and “reformism.”

A) Spoiling the Election? The System needs a little Spoiling.

If my liberal friends were honest, they’d admit they don’t like the current system or the Democrats much more than I do. They wanted single-payer healthcare, immigration reform, an end to the Iraq & Afghanistan invasions, and many other things that the Obama administration and current Democratic congressional majority have failed to provide. I know that voting Green may spoil the elections of some of the Democrats in the race, though the election polls cast doubt on that.

However, my motivation for supporting the Green Party is not based on a calculus of how progressive a given candidate can be. I am voting to end the two-party monopoly. Until there is an organized alternative to the two major parties, there will be no effective organization of progressive political power in this country.

Any progressive person curious to test my point can take the voteeasy.org quiz for themselves. With the exception of Jan Schakowsky, all the Democrats in the race are more conservative than their Green Party rivals. Why? One simple reason is that the Greens take zero corporate contributions.

Call me a spoiler, but until the Democrats decide to return to progressive politics, there is nothing that can convince me that we are better off voting for them. Yes, George Bush was a monster, arguably the worst president ever. And look what happened in his aftermath. The Democrats had to find a way to convince large numbers of progressives who’d been alienated by Clinton and Gore back into the party. Fronting a black candidate was the perfect vehicle.

And, even if the the Obama healthcare plan was a miserable compromise, we actually got a bill after decades of complete stonewalling. Why? Because the Democrats fear another “Nader for President!” Trying to play to the Right with John Kerry blew up in their faces.

I believe in keeping the fear of progressive rebellion front and center in US politics. The Democrats don’t own progressive votes, anymore than the Republicans own conservative votes. The Tea Party is the perfect example of conservative rebellion. Establishment Republicans actually fear the Tea Party for the same reason Democrats fear the Greens.

The Green Party isn’t perfect. But, that’s the fault of American politics in general. Our country is dominated by a EuroAmerican Industrial Capitalist Male Supremacist Oligarchy  The future of our planet requires that we build a Multiracial Ecological Egalitarian Democracy. The Democratic Party has almost no interest in such a revolution. Too bad for them.

B) Do Elections Really Accomplish Anything?

I have been a Libertarian Anti-Capitalist most of my adult life. I am dedicated to synthesizing Anarchism and Marxism (Also, environmentalism, feminism, anti-racism, and pacifism), as readers of my blog should know. I am not exactly anti-statist, but I am decidedly suspicious of over-centralized government.

I know that centralized government seemed necessary to end slavery in the US. Confederate traditions provided shelter for racist economic practices for over a century before the Civil War. In Sweden, the highest average standard of living is obtained from robust central programs of social spending.

However, Sweden is a nation of 9.4 million, which is much smaller than several US states. In 1860, the US was only 31 million. By 1890, territorial expansion and immigration had doubled that figure. Maybe there’s a happy medium between Big Government and Small Government.

Why can’t a regionally organized socialism work here? In fact, as Europe has begun to merge its national economies into the EU, enormous pressure is being brought to bear to abolish social spending. So much for socialism being matter of Big Government!!

C) In Conclusion

I believe that elections are only a small part of radical progress. I don’t believe in organizing armed revolutions, so I reject both Marxist/Leninist (USSR/China) and anarchist (Spanish Revolution) models of people’s military. Furthermore, a mobilized left-wing nonviolent revolution has distinct advantages. We’ve seen successes in India, the Philippines, South Africa, and the US Civil Rights movements.

The proper vehicle for a nonviolent revolution is a mass progressive party that encourages participation at the grass-roots. Today’s Green Party has compromised with its original vision, but in many ways that vision is more intact than within any other political formation on the left. Maybe it doesn’t satisfy my radical left friends, but I continue to believe that in this moment, this is where the leading current of progress is embodied.

I haven’t given up on a popular progressive uprising in the United States. I refuse to accept that Barack Obama’s administration and this Democratic Majority Congress are owed my vote. They have to get it the old-fashioned way, EARN IT!

Passportphoto

Broader Purpose, Broader Base

By Rosdolsky, Hans at Nov 16, 2010 01:49 AM

After the Nov.2 electiond and prior Supreme Court decisions it is clear that US capitalism is unable to extricate itself from its internal contradictions. The classical capitalist response in such situations has been Fascism.  Even now we call no longer call this a democray.

New strategic and tactical thinking is in order:

An intermediate necessary goal  towards a just and sustainable future, however we might imagine it, is popular conquest of state power, and a constitutional Refoundation of American Democracy.  The   practicable economic changes that come after can at this moment only be conjectured, though we know that they will be profound. This is a broad immediate goal to which many would subscribe.

I would enthusiasically support an electoral alliance dedicated to this goal such as a “Populist Party”, which unites Greens, various Socialist and Anarchist groups, and Left Progressives.  Initially the alliance would compete primarily in local elections where there is reasonable chance to win so visibility can be maintained between elections. This party would start out using the ballot slots already won by some of these groups.

There is no reason not to occasionally endorse major party candidates like Kucinich or Rangel on a tactical basis. However the alliance would be in fundamental unconditional but non-violent opposition to the political system as presently constituted and would not entertain vain illusions that change can be achieved by less than a complete overhaul.

This is somewhat akin to zero based budgeting applied to politics - throw out all the dead weight: the pentagon, the prison system, the lobbyists, political advertising, non-representative districting, and much much more.

Reply this comment

Loading_border