Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
In brief, the US-run terrorist war devastated the society, leading to a truce of exhaustion -- and what the Jesuits, at least those who survived Washington's war against the Church -- called a residual "culture of terrorism that domesticates the aspirations of the majority." That's an important insight. Formal democracy is allowed, but people are -- rightly -- frightened, with "domesticated aspirations" that reduce popular initiatives to deal with the terrible problems of the society.
The distribution of wealth and power is such that the reactionary forces supported by the US and responsible for most of the terror retain the executive, though the former guerrilla forces, which are a mixed affair, have a substantial role in the parliament and municipalities. The US makes sure there will be no deviation from control by its clients. During last year's elections, very thinly-veiled warnings were issued of serious retribution of the population voted the wrong way. Whenever it seems that Nicaragua might move away from control by the US favorites, very much the same happens. In short, "democracy" of the usual kind.
The economy keeps strictly to the US-imposed neoliberal model. Income inequality and concentration of wealth appear to have increased. Such work as there is is mostly unskilled in the maquila sector -- very fragile because of competition from even lower cost labor, like China. About 2 million Salvadorans are abroad, many working in miserable conditions in the US and elsewhere. Their remittances is one of the major components of the economy, such as it is.
Some of the Salvadorans are probably in Costa Rica, though most of the dirty work there is apparently done by people fleeing the disaster in Nicaragua -- and as you know, one of its chief architects has just appointed counter-terrorism Czar. Orwell wouldn't have known whether to laugh or weep.
What has happened in the domains of US influence and control should be a matter of deep shame in the US, and should initiate calls for massive reparations, at the very least. We're a long way from that, but that reveals serious flaws in US democracy, not Salvadoran.
Do you know of Pancho
By Kissenger, Clark at Aug 28, 2006 18:56 PM
Do you know of Pancho Villa? Or about the Banana Republics? How about William Walker and his plan to conquer Central America, and then resigned just to conquer Nicaragua and turn it into a slave state?
US has long financed the governments to allow the US and other "hacendados" the rights to exploit the natural resources of the region, or every region, or flat out done so for control of key mercantil trade routes, or control of the region.
The thing is, that reaching the year 2006, and US long sponsorship to the dictatorships that you've talked about, that the region is as it is. If the sponsorships didn't last for so long, the puppet goverments/dictators financed by the US and the oligarcs, would've been long gone: a perfect example in El Salvador is La Matanza by Maximiliano Martinez, Anastasio Aquino, El Mozote in the recent civil war, and most recently the fascist regime of ARENA-PCN that just rig elections to win. Maybe, if such sponsorship ceased, El Salvador could be right now a truly democratic and developed state.
And you know something? D'Aubuisson studied in the School of Americas', was the founder of ARENA, ARENA is the oligarchy owned party. Just the existance of such party and PCN should be considered a violation to the Peace Accords. The reason why CIA finally decided to support Duarte, was because D'Aubuisson was too extreme even for them. Yet Duarte's presidential term was sabotaged by the oligarchy, with such things as the agrarian reform ruined, simply put, he was a president of a nation that he didn't control nor could control. And now present days, USA still supports ARENA, directly intervening into the democratic process of the country,, which is illegal, in name of ARENA. And more than 12 murders a day, high cost of life, constant migration of thousands should refute completely your false assertion that "El Salvador must be living it's most prosperous era". It is simply false.
Also, according to the UN's Truth Commision: over 96% of the human rights violations carried out during the war were committed by the military or the paramilitary death squads, while 3.5% were committed by the guerrilas. The point is, that the ogvernment AGAIN proved to be the genocidal maniacs and engaged on brutalizing every opponent, disappeaing them, exiling them. You couldn't even fight such a regime through diplomatic measures. The offensive was response to the government's such extreme measures.
Reply this comment
But like I said, does
By Kissenger, Clark at Aug 28, 2006 18:32 PM
But like I said, does the
Salvadoran hate the common (non-white supremacists and the other types
of wrong) US citizen?
No*
---
Just a correction. Also, I would urge people to study the real nature behind the developed world's supposed "anti-Western, anti-Americanism". What should be said is "anti-colonialism", "anti-fascim", "anti-exploitation". If people read about Islamic nationalism, pan-Arabism, Arab nationalism, Communism, liberation theology, Christian Democracy, people would learn that those movements/ideologies have become famous because they are movements of independance, against the oppressing movements that subjugated the different nations. It is in a way a "global shout" against global tyranny.
Reply this comment
I am from El Salvador
By Kissenger, Clark at Aug 28, 2006 18:24 PM
And I can tell you that even though El Salvador has had an identity problem since old, being the bastard children of conquistadores, and having a heavily class-tight society, in which there was descrimination against meztisos, natives, and african slaves (to the point where meztisos wanting to earn the creole's approval also became discriminate, to the point that Martinez even banned people from African lineage to be in the country, call Meztisos the Irish of Central America, in reference to the discrimination Irish received in North America when they arrived and how they fought to be accepted as "whites"), I can tell you that as of now, El Salvador's hatred is gear to the same thing USA citizen's hate (or should hate too), the US government, the predatory corporations, the foreign policy and all the misery it has created world wide (All of Latin America being a massive project to control the region by the US, and fight against... communism). But in general, Salvadoreans do not hate those that treat em right, don't marginilaze us, don't treat us like animals, do not allow impunity to go rampant, fight for social justice, fight for the respect of civil liberties and human rights. But like I said, does the Salvadoran hate the common (non-white supremacists and the other types of wrong) US citizen. We are just recentful towards the government that created a hell in our country and even sponsored it, to the point that the Salvadoran Diaspora began, and salvadoreans are forced to leave their country to subexist.
Reply this comment
I love you
By Kissenger, Clark at Aug 28, 2006 18:12 PM
(this was supposed to be my original post, but it seems like it wasn't posted)
Reply this comment
An Addendum to the post above:
By Kissenger, Clark at Aug 28, 2006 18:03 PM
The current regime promised foreign ivnestment, etc. anything and everything to privitaze with the free market, but the only things to come to El Salvador are sweat-shops. Places where people are ENSLAVED, and people cannot demand ANYTHING or else the sweat-shops just fire them and hire other "desperate people" willing to be submitted to slavery, or in some cases just cease operations competely and just MOVE to another country. Unfortunately, thanks to the current regime, that is the only type of labour my fellow compatriots can do, being the unskilled labour market the greatest market in the region, with analphabetism still found. So what I'm trying to say, that the regime has us (the population) easily exploitable, because one we do not know our civil rights, or we are in a position that it is impossible or unwanted to demand our basic human rights with fear of reprisal (they want us to comform with slavery). Either way, because what proliferates is the "unskilled labor" sector, people are by default incapacitated by the state to perform tasks that require greater skill or even expertise.
With bad education, monopolies, etc. the regime make us exploitable, but also sponsors the brain drain of academics or whatever that see here no future. Small to medium companies are a difficulty to mantain, and even with the TLC it is hard to import/export such things into your small businesses and prolong your existance.
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The, Roger at Apr 14, 2005 04:43 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The, Roger at Apr 14, 2005 04:08 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The, Roger at Apr 14, 2005 03:47 AM
Reply this comment
By The-abyss, The-abyss at Apr 13, 2005 03:24 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The-abyss, The-abyss at Apr 13, 2005 00:45 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The-abyss, The-abyss at Apr 11, 2005 05:43 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The-abyss, The-abyss at Apr 11, 2005 05:37 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The-abyss, The-abyss at Apr 11, 2005 05:33 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The-abyss, The-abyss at Apr 11, 2005 03:53 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Antiamerican800, Bernardo at Apr 07, 2005 20:19 PM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Antiamerican800, Bernardo at Apr 06, 2005 23:55 PM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The, Roger at Apr 04, 2005 23:33 PM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By The, Roger at Apr 04, 2005 23:22 PM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Ferguson, Theresa at Mar 21, 2005 22:44 PM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Karakhan, Karakhan at Mar 20, 2005 07:51 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Theabyss2005, Theabyss at Mar 12, 2005 11:28 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Theabyss2005, Theabyss at Mar 12, 2005 10:34 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Adabanasik, Ap2k at Mar 03, 2005 03:36 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Provocateur, Agent at Mar 03, 2005 01:28 AM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Considine, Michael at Mar 02, 2005 23:04 PM
Reply this comment
Re: Washington's "Culture of Terrorism" in El Salvador
By Ott, Dennis at Mar 02, 2005 01:02 AM
Reply this comment