Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Occupy_iowa_city_rally

Paul Street's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/paulstreet
Bio:         Paul Street is an independent radical-democratic policy researcher, journalist, historian, and speaker based in Iowa City, Iowa, and Chicago, Illinois.&nbs... (More)

All Street Blogs

"Who Controls the Past:" Some Historical Quotations For Bush

By Paul Street at Sep 01, 2006


Change Text Size a- | A+

In a press conference 11 days ago, Yale History Major George W. Bush told a reporter that Iraq actually had “nothing” to do with the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. This brief and quickly qualified acknowledgement of an aspect of the truth was made despite the fact that his administration had done everything it could to link Iraq to  9/11, al Qaeda, and the “war on terror" leading up to the U.S. invasion of Mesopotamia.  

Yesterday, Bush gave an alarming (one would hope) speech to the American Legion in which he connected his illegal and disastrous occupation of Iraq with 9/11 and his war on terror. It was like something out of the old Sinclair Lewis novel It Can't Happen Here (1936). 

Crackpot history loomed large in Bush's laughable effort to convince Americans that calling off the vicious imperial assault on Iraq would be tantamount to opening the door to an explosion of "Islamofascist" terror attacks “IN THE STREETS OF OUR OWN CITIES.”

Yes, “in the streets of our own cities.”

As this speech and related recent attemped fear-fanning utterances by the sinister corporate-state war criminals Darth Cheney and Darth Rumsfeld show, Darth Rove et al. have decided to go balls-to-the-mid-term-election-year-wall with the preposterous metaphor between the Western appeasement of fascism in the 1930s and the reluctance of sinister Democratic elites and other supposed leftist agents of national surrender  --- well, actually the majority of the American people --- to continue soullessly crucifying the Middle East in the name of something Team Bush calls “freedom.”

It is perhaps worth noting that our current ruling hollow men would have richly supported the great Nazi appeasement of the 1930s. They would CERTAINLY have shared their interwar predecessors' feeling that European fascism was a welcome counter to European socialism and “bulwark against [Russian] Bolshevism.”

Take my word for it: these newly energized proto-fascistic enemies (and large-scale generators of) of “Islamic fascism” would have liked real deal labor-and left-disciplining European fascism (up to the point where that fascism attacked U.S. interests of course)....just like much of the American business class (including Nazi collaborators in Dubya's family lineage) did at the time.  

Bush and Rove indulged their taste for historical quotation, weaving into yesterday's vapid Legion address Thomas Jefferson 's purported observation that nations cannot move “from despotism to liberty in a featherbed.”

Then the vicious fear-mongering Fortunate Son Deceiver-in-Chief "wiped a tear from his eye" and told the "patriotic" story of a marine he murdered by sending him to his death in Iraq under the false claim that United States troops are over there “fighting terrorists overseas so we do not have to face them here at home.”

Just say it, fellow Americans: what a lying sack of shit.  

Since Bush and his “boy Genius” Rove (who may have recently finished his doctoral Dissertation in History at the University of Texas) like historical quotations, here are a few of my favorites that relate in important ways to the historic crimes of the Bush cabal:

"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."

-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

 

"The fetters imposed on liberty at home have ever been forged out of the weapons provided for defense against real, pretended, or imaginary dangers abroad."

 - James Madison, 1799

 

"The process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."

 - Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding America 's Defenses: Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century (September 2000)

 

"Think about 'how do you capitalize on these opportunities?

- Condaleeza Rice, White House National Security Adviser, to the United States National Security Council, September 12, 2001.

 

"Through the tears of sadness, I see an opportunity."

 - George W. Bush, September 14, 2001

 

I highly recommend an essay titled “The Orwell Diversion” (1986), written by the late Australian propaganda critic Alex Carey and included in his 1997 book Taking the Risk Out of Democracy: Corporate Propaganda Versus Freedom and Liberty. In that essay and elsewhere, Carey argued that the most relevant long-term threat to liberal democracy has never come from the state totalitarians of the Stalinist left or the fascist right. It comes instead from the homegrown, big business-connected “Respectable Right” that arose within the liberal-democratic societies of the West (chiefly the US ) largely to protect concentrated corporate power against its natural homeland antagonist - the popular democratic tradition.

Twenty years after Carey's essay, the Soviet Union has long ago joined Nazi Germany in history's proverbial dustbin and the last classic 1984-style regime (if such a thing has ever existed) bangs its little nuclear drum for global food assistance in North Korea . Meanwhile, a homegrown version of Big Brother stalks the corridors of domestic and imperial power in Washington D.C. , wearing the uniform of the Respectable Right. He is deeply enabled by a corporate communications and entertainment empire that combines Huxley with Orwell to muddy the waters of popular perception in ways that modern red- and brown-fascist state-totalitarians could only dream about. He is ineluctably if perhaps unconsciously drawn to the wisdom of Orwell's chilling axiom: “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

Person

Must be a scam..

By Kissenger, Clark at Oct 01, 2006 21:56 PM

As I said before we are being fed scams by videos.

 

Videos are no proofs..

Reply this comment


Person

hey victor

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 11, 2006 20:21 PM

its make a long time we didnt hear about Bwong and his theory about islamofascists, when you hear from him show him this link.. it may help him discriminate less a about arabs..

Reply this comment


Person

Russia/China

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 11, 2006 15:06 PM

Hi cyrano. It will be interesting to see how the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) plays into all this before it is over. Russia is back on the scene as a major player and is quietly playing an international game of chess with the American Empire (who is more adept at checkers), striking strategic energy and economic agreements all over the world, currently wooing Iran and Venezuela while the US is distracted by other events. The SCO is a key part of that. Economically, the US is being hemmed in from all sides by the new multi-laterals. The last step will certainly be giving up the US dollar as the international trade unit of money. At that point the US loses all.

Reply this comment


Person

Trouble in Iraq..

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 11, 2006 13:37 PM

hi Victor,

Bush experiment did not work in Iraq, now its civil war over there and no one will be able to exploit oil for now; excepted by american thief using the back doors.. The next Goal is Iran, Bush has all the intents of curbing China and the EU economic resurgence as it feel threatened by competition and free markets.. This is bad news because iran has the new Quassed , a 2 thousand lbs bomb more powerful ( I think) than the bombs that were stalking Saddam Hussein in Iraq..You will se a great number of casualities as the US Military planners will deliberately target civilian populations.

Army is calling it quit

Reply this comment


Person

Having Trouble in Iraq, Mr. Bush?

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 11, 2006 10:26 AM

Just picked up on this today. Seems even the usually politically correct and obedient US military is about to throw in the towel in Iraq. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14757615/ Anbar province is virtually lost. The interesting thing is that it seems to have become a major Al Qaeda camping ground. Al Qaeda is said to be the only remaining government there. And here in a country that had virtually no Al Quaeda presence 3 years ago. Now it is brimming with them. Nice job, Bush. Way to go on the War on Terror. For once once, I now believe you that Iraq is festering with Al Qaeda! I think the military wants out. They admit that there is nothing they can do. The report is classified, but the word has got out. Good timing too - near elections. Not that it will matter much - the American people are so pacified now, nothing seems to upset them anymore - not the failure in Iraq, not the failure in Afghanistan, not the complicity of their Government in the 9/11 catastrophie and not in the evolution of an American fascist State.

Reply this comment


Person

Entertainment

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 07, 2006 15:23 PM

Reply this comment


Person

Taliban..

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 06, 2006 07:02 AM

Recently, I said that living under Taliban was probably not worst than living in Saudi Arabia. - According to my afghanistani friend, Taliban were also trained to be soldiers jihadist by the US in pakistan against Russian forces.- americans still have footage of the trainings- When Taliban routed the Russian and affirmed power they took the afghans who collaborated with the russian and put them to deaths. apparently there exist -americans footage of the atrocities- - Currently, aghanis are being duped with the -heavenly puppies- this buy their silence for the OIL the US is stealing from the back doors. - The opium trade profits will serve training new guerillas or terrorists to fight Iran.. - Iraq'oil is also being smuggled out of Iraq. -The Oil being smuggled would explain the recent decrease in Oil Price form above a dollars to 80 cents a liter..

Reply this comment


Person

Occult BinlaBush

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 06, 2006 06:48 AM

Keir, Pangeae.. The the level of lies we are being subjected by the Bush administration, i am wondering if its not a form of occultism

reference: Hitlerizaion of everything america hates -paul street-

Reply this comment


Person

Some difference, yes

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 11:48 AM

There is obviously some differences between now and 1986. But I assume the commercials were removed from the clip - there was a cut there in the middle. I suppose one could call the 1986 Crossfire debate, but I don't really agree. It's more like three people attacking Zappa, and he making some valid comments back trying to refute some of the rants. In this department not much has changed. Yes there are times when dissident voices (that's what I meant) are in the media, but they are heavily out-gunned by extremist voices. But I do agree the situation is worse now. There are exceptions to the rule, but mainly what we see is commercials of various kinds - even in the "news". BBC used to be good a few years ago, but it has taken a massive nose-dive. The only programs worth thinking about watching nowadays are HardTalk and Dateline London. At least these make an attempt at debate. On CNN there is the Doha Debates (at least on the international CNN) that sometimes are decent. But even these programs have plenty of extremists. Newschannels have gone the way of regular commercial channels. There is content (commercials) and fill (news). And the newspart hardly contains news anymore. It simply amounts to a propaganda system filled with lies, half-truths and celebrity "news". Might as well close down the mainstream media channels cause they clearly aren't doing what they are supposed to do. Pangaea Oslo, Norway

Reply this comment


Person

the difference

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 10:41 AM

The difference between CNN's Crossfire 20 years ago and what passes for political discourse now is obvious enough to me. I would find it difficult to find a 20 minute open debate anywhere in the mainstream media now. Then there is the visual assault when one watches these programs today: colorful morphing graphics, the ubiquitous news ticker at the bottom of the screen, hairstyles for chrissakes. The Crossfire program, whatever its many shortcomings, could still be narrowly considered political debate. Its most visible spawn, Hannity and Colmes, is strictly entertainment . . . not even enterntainment: unsubtle hypnosis designed solely to keep viewers' attention between blocks of advertising. I don't think it is true that "people like Zappa" (you mean because of his music, or his views, or his career?) are no longer invited on such programs. Amy Goodman has made a few mainstream media appearances recently (with debate time however limited to a few minutes). But the unfavorable conditions for actual discourse have caused Chomsky (for example) to avoid such pseudo debates. At once I both admire people like Goodman and Robert Jensen and others for taking on the "media-monsters" on their turf and respect Chomsky's unwillingness to do so. Keir The Hague

Reply this comment


Person

Thanks for the links

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 08:43 AM

Thanks for the links, I found the first shortly after writing here though. Just didn't bother to mention it. Gotta hand it to Frank Zappa, he carried himself well after being attacked from all sides. Sad to see the media talking-heads haven't changed a bit though. "Pretty please change our media to Soviet-style propaganda machines". No worries, that has been achieved. It's even more effective than soviet-style propaganda too. Corrupt everybody and teach them to write this way, or be laid off. I don't really see a big difference from that show 20 years ago and today's shows (except people like Zappa would never be let on nowadays). Then dissidents were attacked from extremists. Now dissidents are attacked from extremists. The only difference is that then dissidents sometimes were present so they had a chance to defend themselves. That is not the case anymore. Now they media-monsters prefer to just attack, attack and attack some more - with no chance of anybody saying anything back.

Reply this comment


Person

Islamofasc..... err islamobush ..

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 07:26 AM

I present you the great Ayatollah of all lies, G W bin laBush, the evangelist of war and deception, the preacher of barbarism, america's terrorist.. islamobush Wanted Bin laBush is the alleged terrorist whom allegedly ordered 9/11. first of all, he has a false sens of grievance against muslim.American are a very irrational people, they see islamofascist every where. since islamo fascism does not exist, american had to invent islamofascists to scare their children with. As an american, american also build WMDs and bombs, because that's what americans do , building bombs. its part of their culture. American heroes all used bombs, The unabomber, Timotty Mc-Veil, Donal Rumsfeld, hiroshima, agent orange and napalm bombs.. Bin LaBush has been hiding in the United Sates a country whom has been know to arbour terrorists and whom promotes imperialists wars against the p0or heil your Tvs, Heil you Bin Labush.

Osama Bin laden denies the attack of 9/11

Its not bin laden. you have no proof al-quiad is in iraq except by videos..

Reply this comment


Person

since 91, this make about 5 years..

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 04:05 AM

he does look very good for a man that has been stalked by entire armies for the past 5 years, right? he looks fresh from a vacation I say.. ( Note, he could pass for one of GWB relative, really, may be someone from Bush "islamofascist" side of his familly..who knows I overheard Bush gran-pa traded with the nazis..

 

Reply this comment


Person

that video

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 03:42 AM

Pangaea try this video link, and if it doesn't work, this should. (Sorry 'bout the off topic banter, Paul...) Keir The Hague

Reply this comment


Person

two links

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 03:28 AM

pangeae I have two links one display al Qaeda's second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahri, he is so well rested it is as if he come from straight your nearest CIA office..
Link two is a google search

Reply this comment


Person

Video gone and the US

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 05, 2006 02:36 AM

The video has been removed for some reason. [Insert favourite conspiracy theory here] First of all it seems that people have the illusion that Bush was elected. He wasn't. He was selected by the friends of his father in the Supreme Court. This coupled with many blacks illegally losing their voting rights, meant Bush "won" the election. If all the votes were recounted as they should have been, Bush still would have lost though. The situation wasn't much changed for 2004. bwong, you seem to have caught the "If you're not with us, you're with the terrorists"-syndrome. Just because we say that Hezbollah and the Palestinians have the right to resist occupation (as they do per international law), it doesn't mean that we are 100% behind them and fully support what they stand for. I have many problems with Hezbollah and Hamas (I'm an atheist for instance), but I still support their right to resist illegal occupations. A bit like "I don't like what you say, but I support your right to say it". The problem is Israel and the US, and that has pretty much always been the case. You are blaming the victims instead of the aggressor. Why do you do that?

Reply this comment


Person

something wong with bwong

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 04, 2006 23:13 PM

its religious fear of homosexuals that re-elected Bush.. Bwong, there is something wong with the latest Al-Quiada video. past Al-Quaida video wanted to destroy america, now there is a radical shift of ideology; its the first time Al- Quaida jst want convert america to islam.. This is suspicious.. Ii doubt the latest video constitute a threat, really cuz no westerner would convert.. You also appear to distort what the american did in Afghanistan. It trained guerillas and formed Al- Quaida network via the CIA, the same way the US is paying mercenaries to get ride of Taliban. I agree Bin-Laden is anti-US, but it does not means Bin Laden has control of his whole network; we were never provided of any physical proof that he was responsible for 9/11. zappa fought the religious right and censure for most of his life, he hated that religious group censored his music, he also didnt like reagan bs a bit. the religious right made a difference last election, its religious fear of homosexuals that re-elected Bush and its fascists policies.. I don't know bwong if you respected the last religious vote in the US, you must respect that religious people would vote for nationalist elements in ME to oppose american imperialism. And I would not dismiss religion so fast in america, a lots of issue are still considered on the basis of religion. its life..

Reply this comment


Person

whaddya know about irony?

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 04, 2006 20:36 PM

Get over yourself. It's a goddamn Frank Zappa quote. Lighten up. And where the hell do you get the notion that I "cheer" Hezbollah or Iran? What is wrong with you? Keir The Hague

Reply this comment


Person

A Fascist theocracy? C'mon

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 04, 2006 19:49 PM

A Fascist theocracy? C'mon now I don't see the U.S. government imposing the law of Moses, executing homosexuals and stonning women for adultery any time soon. It is not without irony that this warning is dug up by someone who cheers for Hezzbollah and Iran. It is even more ironic the the warning was made 20 years ago, that was when Reagan was in power. Apart from being a Christian fundamentalist himself he was the one actively arming and funding Islamofascists ("freedom fighters") to fight "Soviet imperalism". This laid down a large part of the infrastructures for Islamic terrorism today. Now the Islamists are the darlings of some "leftists" because they are "freedom fighters" against U.S imperialism. The Christian right always have influences among its core consistuencies but it strength tends to be over estimated.Last year David Peterson reported that there were several states where local school boards had been pushing for intelligent design. It happened that all board members who advocated for intelligent design were tossed out of office in subsequent elections. The Bush administration is somewhat of an anomaly, and keep in mind that neither Bush nor Reagan were elected primarily because of Christianity,it was the convergence of many interests and anxieties that put them in the White House.I expected the influence of the Christian right in the next administration will be greatly diminished. In the U.S. CEOs still call the shot, not fire and brimestone preachers. The antics of the Christian right never sit well with the urban elite.

Reply this comment


Person

Another quote fer ya...

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 04, 2006 15:52 PM

"The biggest threat to America today is not communism; it's moving America towards a fascist theocracy..." --Frank Zappa appearing on Crossfire in 1986. Check out this link and enjoy the level and pacing of political debate that featured on CNN just 20 years ago. Keir The Hague

Reply this comment


Person

The Al-Quaida converting americans to islam hoax

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 02, 2006 17:20 PM

I think that the US propaganda machine work to well in hands with the elusive Al-Quaida.. I think there is too much al-quaida bull shit not to believ that the terrorist threat is not created by Bush and subversive elements in the US

Bwong it does seem that your islamofascists is more a terro plot emaning from americans to push for the occupation of arab land..

I dont Know it seem to be a Bush 's Al-Quaida to me..

Reply this comment


Person

US Sponsor of terrorism..

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 02, 2006 14:51 PM

In Afghanistan the culture of opium is on the rise.. and guess what the opiuim will be used for? It wiil sponsor terrorism actions in the ME, the best guess will be to sponsor US terrorism against the sovereign nation of Iran..(must be an idea of Bush daddy)

Its amazing, talk about a corrupted ideology..

Reply this comment


Person

nearly impossible

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 02, 2006 12:52 PM

Its nearly impossible to induce lies upon a population without knowing the truth. Note, Hillary Clinton espouses all the lies Bush does, do you claim she is an illiterate and a puppet? These people only believe the lies they tell in the measure that its right do do so because it is in the interests of the few friends they have, they completely disregard the side effects a bit like a business owner that will underpay his workers to maintain a greater profit of higher standard of life.This from your elected representative is a form of trahison. As far as the matter of others is concerned, it does not count, what count is their little interests. Here Bush says Iraq is not in a Civil war, I guess our friend Karl the brown shirt above whom seem to agree its ok to have arabs killing each others would finally agree the info is conflicting I dont know, if you can't tell the truth may be confusing the truth appears to be the tactic (jezzzuses, noone appreciated my Zappa tunes)

Reply this comment


Person

Bush the Puppet (Kermit?)

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 02, 2006 08:58 AM

Gotta say I agree with you there. This would also make sense strategically from the Republican planners POV. If Bush knew that all speeches handed to him were full of lies, that the US aren't fighting for freedom and liberty, but against it, he wouldn't be near as "convincing" in his speeches and actions. If he actually believes that the US are in a fight for its survival against religious lunatics that "hate our freedoms", his answers and actions will reflect this. In this regard he is just another Ronald Reagan. In other words a puppet. I assume Rumsfeld and Bush' speeches were the first in a long line of similar indoctrination attempts before the election. Rove has one overbearing principle in his campaigns: attack the Democrats where they are strong. They are strong on the Iraq war (well, not really, but they should be). Therefore the campaign is aimed at spreading fear about Arabs and "terrorism" so people will think the Democrats are "selling out" the US if opposing Bush - or better yet, won't dare to oppose Bush because they see this consequence. Orwell must be rolling in his grave, and Gõhring must be cheering in his.

Reply this comment


Person

I wonder...

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 01, 2006 23:06 PM

...if Bush actually believes the lies he's constantly telling. Or is it just an act? I saw most of the mentioned speech, and it he's really out there by now. I'm sure Orwell and Gohring would nod approvingly. A-class propaganda. That Gohring quote perfectly sums up US (and to a lesser extent European) media. The goal is to keep people afraid so the elite can carry out atrocious wars and policies, and even spy on its own citizens. I'm afraid it will take decades to re-win the liberties lost through the Patriot Act and its European versions. The politicians ought to be hanged from lamp-posts Ceausescu-style. There is no excuse for what they have done. None whatsoever. They have betrayed their own peoples, and they have committed warcrimes of the highest order. I'm against death penalty, but I'm almost willing to make exceptions here. There are no words for the horrors the politicians of the West have carried out. Crimes against humanity and warcrimes are the legal terms, but they don't even come close to describing what has "gone down".

Reply this comment


Person

You agree ?

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 01, 2006 21:02 PM

You think you've won something don't you? You aren't very intelligent,civil war in Iraq means you lost control of Iraq..Now the US may have succeeded in securing a civil war in Iraq, yet you only delayed the problem of securing oil flows. This civil war was induced by the US..its a crime. Your empire is economically falling, you are so desperate you are going all out for an arm race, this will destroy you and its not going to feed american kids.. It is the earth and farms that feed our childrens, not the economy and your exxon valdez spills.

Reply this comment


Person

What a lying sack of shit.

By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 01, 2006 20:41 PM

This is a fearless essay, I hope the concerned sack-a-shit read this essay.. Here in this link The US is "trying" announcing a civil war in Iraq, problem is the US is trying to re-write the past in Iraq. the Civil war commenced 2 years ago. Talking about Past, the late Frank Zappa wrote a song, it is so uncanny, he most have foreseen the rise of BusH, and the ascension fascism in US..

Ladies, gentlemen , Paul , please enjoy!

oops there is also this song below.. heil your TV you fascists GWB is hiding behind it!

Reply this comment


Person

Yes, I agree completely! 

By Brothernumbertwo, Rudy at Sep 01, 2006 20:37 PM

Yes, I agree completely!  Screw the Iraqi people.  They were screwed livng in slavery under Saddam, and they're screwed now as they try to sort things out in the aftermath.  I guess they're screwed either way.  But as long as they are screwing themselves and the U.S. isn't doing it, then all is good. 

Reply this comment

Loading_border