Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Why Free Market Ideologues Violate Their Faith: “To preserve it”

By Michael McGehee at Oct 14, 2008


Change Text Size a- | A+
It is February 7, 1968 and Peter Arnett is reporting on the Vietnam War. He quotes a U.S. Airforce major:
It became necessary to destroy the village in order to save it.
Flash forward to October 14, 2008.
 
President Bush has announced that within the "bailout" plan $250 billion of taxpayer money will be used to buy stocks in nine banks.
 
The increasing comments about the apparently anti-free market policies put him on the defensive and today he said "these measures are not intended to take over the free market, but to preserve it."
 
Déjà vu.
 
Yeah right, George. I am sure it makes a lot of sense to you. Being someone who has constantly had to rely on family and close connections to bail you out of your jams. And all through them I am sure you told yourself you are still free, independent and responsible.
 
But what irked me about this notion of "preserving" (everyone knows the more appropriate term is "preventing") big banks from suffering the consequences of their actions is the bankruptcy laws in 2005.
 
When the guy on Main Street has difficulty with his debt he doesn't get a bailout. President Bush and Congress don't rush to pay his bills. He gets stricter laws telling him his bankruptcy is fraudulent and makes it harder for him to seek relief.
 
And Noam Chomsky has recently pointed out the obvious in regards to the myth of Free Markets when he noted:
First, we should be clear about the fact that capitalism can't end because it never started. The system we live in should be called state capitalism, not just capitalism. So, take the United States. The economy relies very heavily on the state sector. There is a lot of agony now about socialization of the economy, but that is a bad joke. The advanced economy, high technology and so forth, has always relied extensively on the dynamic state sector of the economy. That's true of computers, the internet, aircraft, biotechnology, just about everywhere you look. MIT, where I am speaking to you, is a kind of funnel into which the public pours money and out of it comes the technology of the future which will be handed over to private power for profit. So what you have is a system of socialization of cost and risk and privatization of profit. And that's not just in the financial system. It is the whole advanced economy.

The faith-based ideologues known as Capitalists should just admit that there is and never has been a Free Market.

You cannot "preserve" that which does not exist.

Admit it.

The only thing being preserved is the wealth and leisure of affluent bankers.

And don't expect us to forget your response to Main Street in 2005. You can cover cow shit in strawberries, but even us simple folk in Texas won't eat it.

Loading_border