Why I'm Not Now and Have Never Been the Democrats' "Rush Limbaugh"
President Obama and the Democratic Party have wasted no time in pointing out to the American people this marriage from hell, tying Rush like a rock around the collective Republican neck and hoping for its quick descent to the netherworld of irrelevance.
But some commentators (Richard Wolffe of Newsweek, Chuck Todd of NBC News, etc.) have likened this to "what Republicans tried to do to the Democrats with Michael Moore." Perhaps. But there is one central difference: What I have believed in, and what I have stood for in these past eight years - an end to the war, establishing universal health care, closing Guantanamo and banning torture, making the rich pay more taxes and aggressively going after the corporate chiefs on Wall Street - these are all things which the majority of Americans believe in too. That's why in November the majority voted for the guy I voted for. The majority of Americans rejected the ideology of Rush and embraced the same issues I have raised consistently in my movies and books.
How did this happen? Considering how, for the past eight years, the Republican machine thought they could somehow smear and damage the Democrats if they said it was "the party of Michael Moore," it appears that the American public heard them loud and clear and decided that, "hey, if you say Michael Moore is connected to the Democrats, then the Democrats must be OK!"
During this past election, a Democrat in
There have been over a half-dozen attack documentaries on me ("Michael Moore Hates America," "Fahrenhype 9/11," etc.), plus a feature film starring Kelsey Grammer and James Woods that had me being slapped silly for 83 minutes. Several books have been written by the Right in a concerted attempt to denounce me. One book, "100 People Who Are Screwing Up
What made the Republicans so sure that Americans would recoil upon the mere mention of my name, or by simply showing a photo of my face?
The result of this was one colossal backfire. The more they attacked me, the more the public decided to check out who this "devil" was and what he was saying. And - oops! - more than a few people liked what they saw. Overnight I went from having a small, loyal following to having millions go to movie theaters to watch ... documentaries? Wow.
Yes, the more the Right went after me, the more people got to hear what I was saying - and eventually the majority, for some strange reason, ended up agreeing with me - not Rush Limbaugh - and elected Barack Obama as president of the United States, a man who promised to end the war, bring about universal health care, close Guantanamo, stop torture, tax the rich, and rein in the abusive masters of Wall Street.
Think about this road I've traveled. At the beginning of the Bush years, I was pretty much an outsider, referred to as being on the "far left." I usually found myself holding viewpoints that differed from the majority of the people in this country. When I spoke out against the war - before it even started - I was marginalized by the mainstream media and then booed off the Oscar stage in "liberal
But I stuck to what I believed in, kept churning out my movies, and never looked back. The Right and the White House spokespeople came after me time after time. President Bush 41 called me an "a**" on TV, and I became a favorite punching bag at both the 2004 and 2008 Republican National Conventions in speeches by John McCain and Joe Lieberman. On the front page of this morning's Washington Post, Mark McKinnon, a top adviser to George W. Bush, revealed - for the first time - the Bush White House strategy of singling me out in the hopes of turning the country against me and the Democratic Party. Here's what the Post said:
Mark McKinnon, a top adviser in President George W. Bush's campaigns, acknowledged the value of picking a divisive opponent. "We used a similar strategy by making Michael Moore the face of the Democratic Party," he said of the documentary filmmaker.
In the end it all proved to be a big strategic mistake on their part. Thanks to the Republican attacks on me, average Joes and Janes started to listen to what I had to say. Contrary to Richard Wolffe's assessment that "there were no Democrats as far as I can remember who were saying they stood with Michael Moore," Democrats, in fact, have stood side by side with me during all of this. Here's the Congressional Black Caucus supporting me on Capitol Hill in 2004. Here's Terry McAuliffe, the head of the Democratic National Committee, enthusiastically attending the premiere of "Fahrenheit 9/11" with two dozen senators and members of Congress. Here's a group of Democratic congresspeople endorsing my film "Sicko" in the chambers of the House Judiciary Committee in 2007. And here's President Jimmy Carter inviting me to sit with him in his box at the Democratic National Convention. Far from making me into a pariah, the Republicans helped the Democratic leadership realize that to identify themselves publicly with me meant reaching the millions who followed and supported my work.
Though John Kerry lost in 2004, my focus that year had been to get young voters registered and out to vote (I visited over 60 campuses). And so, just a few short months after the release of "Fahrenheit 9/11,"
After Fahrenheit, I kept speaking out, the Republican machine kept attacking me, and two years later, in 2006, the American public sided with me - not Rush Limbaugh - and voted in the Democrats to take over both houses of Congress.
And then, finally, two years after that, we won the White House.
That's the difference - The American people agree with me, not Rush.
The American public believes that health care is a right and not a commodity.
They want tougher environmental laws and believe that global warming is real, not a myth.
They believe that the rich should be taxed more.
They want to go after the crooks on Wall Street who got us into this mess and the politicians who enabled them.
They want more money invested in education, science, technology and infrastructure - not in more tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.
They believe that, whether Democrats or Republicans have been in power, wealthy corporations have been calling the shots for the past few decades and the American people's voices have not been heard as their country has slowly been driven into the ground. Our politicians and our media have been bought and paid for by the highest bidders and we don't trust them anymore.
Finally - they want us to get the hell out of Iraq and to investigate the criminals who sent us there for fictitious reasons.
Obama and the Democrats going after Rush is a good thing and will not do for him what the Republican attack plan did for me - namely, the majority of Americans will never be sympathetic to Rush because they simply don't agree with him.
The days of using my name as a pejorative are now over. The right wing turned me into an accidental spokesperson for the liberal, majority agenda. Thank you, Republican Party. You helped us elect one of the most liberal senators to the presidency of the United States. We couldn't have done it without you.




Premature celebration
By Jackson jr, William at Mar 09, 2009 11:05 AM
Yes, the more the Right went after me, the more people got to hear what I was saying - and eventually the majority, for some strange reason, ended up agreeing with me - not Rush Limbaugh - and elected Barack Obama as president of the United States, a man who promised to end the war, bring about universal health care, close Guantanamo, stop torture, tax the rich, and rein in the abusive masters of Wall Street.
-Michael Moore
Mike I hate to break this to you but your guy in the White House doesn't support the progressive agenda you've described any more than his predecessor.
Reply this comment
Re: Premature celebration
By Loewen, Matt at Mar 09, 2009 13:40 PM
I agree with your sentiment, William, that Obama is still considerably right of public opinion- the escalation in Afghanistan is a telling example. He still is the President, after all. But isn't he also left of Bush in some areas (for instance, closing Guantanamo)? Should that be taken into consideration?
Do you think his more 'progressive' policies right now are more based solely on trying to mollify the populace and re-establish Americas image as the global moral exemplary and rightful ruler of the world?
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Premature celebration
By Jackson jr, William at Mar 09, 2009 14:29 PM
Matt I'm not sure how much faith I'd put in Obama's commitment to end torture by US forces anywhere--not just Guantanamo--in pursuit of our Global War on a Tactic. Given the Obama administration's recent decision to back-stop the Bush era violations of US law in the warrant-less wiretapping of American citizens, his escalation of our aggression in Afghanistan, and his "withdrawal" plan that miraculously leaves up to 50,000 US troops in Iraq indefinitely, I'm just not that optimistic that US foreign or domestic policy is heading in a truly progressive direction any time soon. I'd love to be proven wrong.
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Re: Premature celebration
By Loewen, Matt at Mar 09, 2009 15:10 PM
Yeah, your phrase 'truly progressive' is important- Obama's progressiveness falls within the narrow scope of powerful interests, which is why I put 'progressive' in brackets in my original comment. I think the test of Obama's moral fiber was over for me when he responded to what was happening in Gaza with the usual pro-Israel state-terrorism bullshit.
Reply this comment
Re: Premature celebration
By Andrews, John at Mar 09, 2009 14:25 PM
'It gained in strength by the sudden ascendancy of William Jennings Bryan who had stampeded the Democratic Convention by an eloquent speech and the catch phrase: "You shall not press down upon the brow of labour the crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon the cross of gold". Bryan was running for the presidency: the "silver-tongued" orator had caught the fancy of the man in the street. The American liberals, who so easily fall for every new political scheme, went over to Bryan on free silver almost to a man. Even some anarchists were carried away by his slogans'.
Emma Goldman, Living My Life, Dover Books, Volume 1 Page 179.
Emma was recounting events in the late 1890's.
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Premature celebration
By Jackson jr, William at Mar 09, 2009 14:31 PM
@ John
Exactly.
Reply this comment