Woods Hole Movie Screen Goes Dark
By Chris Spannos at Jul 09, 2010 |
|
The latest in our local controversy surrounding our Cinema Politica screening of the film Occupation 101 in response to the Israeli raid on the Gaza Flotilla for human rights.
Woods Hole movie screen goes dark
WOODS HOLE — Some residents are worried the curtain is falling on the First Amendment after a nonprofit group was banned for the summer from screening movies, including controversial documentaries, in a town-owned building.
The Woods Hole chapter of Cinema Politica, a Canada-based group that showcases independent political films, has featured alternative movies every Friday night for the past 18 months in the former Water Street fire station building.
But the Woods Hole Community Association, a nonprofit group that leases the building from the town, suspended the chapter after receiving complaints related to several movies involving the ongoing conflict between Palestine and Israel.
"It comes down to the fact that this raises a whole host of free-speech issues," said Chris Spannos, a founding member of the Woods Hole branch of Cinema Politica.
But Catherine Bumpus and Steve Junker, co-presidents of the community association, said they've been receiving complaints from Woods Hole residents about the group for more than a year.
The decision to suspend Cinema Politica for the remainder of the summer was based on a breakdown in communication, Bumpus said, and not because of the content of the films.
Cinema Politica pays $40 a week to rent the fire station space, but there is no written contract between the two sides.
Elise Hugus and her husband Daniel Cojanu, two founding members of Cinema Politica, met with Bumpus and Junker in December because of several complaints the association had received regarding controversial movies.
Cojanu said he and Hugus were informed of vague complaints about the movie content, but neither side knew how to fix the problem. That's when Bumpus and Junker came up with a temporary solution: notify the association prior to showing films about Palestine and Israel.
"Why do we need to give this topic special treatment?" Cojanu said yesterday. "From that point of view, we felt it was a freedom of speech issue."
But Bumpus said the association is not in the business of censoring anyone, and that Hugus offered to give the group advance notice if a movie concerning the Middle East was going to be shown.
So when Cinema Politica made a last-minute decision to screen a film called "Occupation 101," about the Palestinian/Israeli conflict, on June 4, Bumpus said she grew concerned about false promises.
"We received e-mails that Friday, late in the afternoon, saying it was being shown, and we responded that we were disappointed not to have heard beforehand as they had offered," Bumpus said.
Cinema Politica members then penned a two-page response to the community association, calling for all future communication to be in writing. That raised "a lot of red flags" within the association, Bumpus said, and a decision was made several days later to suspend Cinema Politica for the rest of the summer and reconsider the group's use of the building in the fall.
Spannos said the decision to show "Occupation 101" was because of the deadly May 31 Israeli raid on an aid flotilla bound for Gaza. Among those detained by the Israelis was Woods Hole resident Kathy Sheetz. "We always try to tie the movie in to current events, so this seemed like a very apt moment to show the film, following the flotilla invasion."
More than 50 people attended, he said, making it by far the largest audience since the club's inception. And the "respectful and safe" discussion that followed is exactly the kind of discourse for which the group was formed, Spannos said.
Cinema Politica provides a year-round activity for people who seek an alternative to bars and parties, Spannos said, and they show films devoted to varied topics.
The group is trying to find a temporary summer location and wants to remain in Woods Hole. But not at the risk of censoring themselves or the movies they screen, Spannos said.
Ben Panish, 21, a frequent attendee, said he signed an online petition condemning the community association's actions. He said people can be offended by almost anything, so drawing an arbitrary line in the sand at movies involving the Middle East is foolhardy.
"Films about Palestine are no more troubling than anything else, but it hit a nerve with some members on the board," Panish said. "I'm surprised because this is a small community of people in Woods Hole with the same ideals and it's been going on for a year and a half. This is an infringement on free speech."
The Woods Hole Community Association, which got its start in 1918, allows the old fire station to be used for folk dancing, theater, a farmers market and the Woods Hole Film Festival.
Film choices
Some movies screened by Cinema Politica before its recent suspension:
- "Sharkwater"
- "Grass"
- "One Man, One Cow, One Planet"
- "Occupation 101"
- "The Art of Resistance"
- "RiP: A Remix Manifesto"
- "Burma VJ"
- "Earth Keepers"
- "Dreamland"
Source: Cinema Politica website




"Free Speech" issue?
By Abraham, Steve at Jul 09, 2010 20:23 PM
Cinema Politica sounds like an excellent organization and these film screenings also sound like something every community in the U.S. could use. I look forward to seeing "Occupation 101" as soon as I can.
I take small issue with the framing of this problem as a "free speech" issue. There's also freedom of association, and the WHCA is free to dis-associate with Cinema Politica if they so choose, whether we like it or not. The right to free speech, by my pedestrian understanding, is simply the right to not be imprisoned by the state as a result of speech. Nothing like that appears to be going on here. I would worry that framing it that way would only be a further-alienating tactic against an organization that was willing to work with Cinema Politica for 18 months in the past.
I would hope trying harder to work with them, rather than self-righteously condemning them and not respecting their right to free association, would be a better tactic. If they were really just concerned by the request for the reply in writing, hopefully that would be an issue that could be cleared up simply by explaining that, due to the sensitive nature of the issue, it would help to have something in writing for the sake of clarity.
I just get a little tired of us loosely crying foul against any organization perceived to be doing us wrong. Like I said, I think it's alienating to organizations that we could use on our side. This doesn't appear to be an entity like the Israeli government, Democratic Party, or someone else with disproportionate power compared to Cinema Politica. It's a community association that puts on farmer's markets and folk-dancing. Be wary of the bridges before they get burned.
Reply this comment
Re: "Free Speech" issue?
By Spannos, Chris at Jul 09, 2010 21:03 PM
Hi Steve,
What you say about free association might be right, I’m not sure, but if so, they used it quite skillfully in a way that, on the surface, side-steps the free speech issue. For example, prior to deciding to stop renting the space to us they were requesting that we give them advance notice of any screening of movies relating to Israel/Palestine. We made clear in our letter to them that we would not abide any such request from them since that would be a violation of our own mission as part of Cinema Politica. They didn't like that response so they pulled the space from us.
More, of all the different types of films we show, why do they have concern for films relating to only Palestine and not, say, Sharks, which we also have screened films about. It might seem obvious why, except we have never received an explanation from them about why they have the reaction that they do. So, without their explanation, we are left shooting in the dark about their reasoning, and since we are not mind readers we actually can’t make up their reasons for them or even really assume them. However, I suspect that if we did know them, they wouldn’t make that much sense anyway… At its core, we think there is a free speech issue involved.
Also, while I admit to not knowing any legalities about this, the space is not a private for profit center, but is rented by the town. It is also true that this area has had other events canceled, relating to Israel/Palestine through the lenses of human rights and international law, that were at public institutions, not private. Again, I'm not sure of the legalities, but the issue of association may have a different validity in a public vs. private institutions -- I'm not sure. We have however, been approached by people within the legal and human rights profession who do specialize in these areas and who have offered to help.
Reply this comment
Letter to the Journalist
By Spannos, Chris at Jul 09, 2010 17:50 PM
Hi Aaron,
Thank you very much for the opportunity to talk with you about the Woods Hole Community Association’s (WHCA) censoring of Cinema Poltica for our screening of Occupation 101. You did a very good job in your article published in today’s Cape Cod Times Online, summarizing the different perspectives and providing a context that allows people to make up their minds for themselves. Nice work.
There is however, one important error in your article, in the paragraph that says:
"Cinema Politica members then penned a two-page response to the community association, calling for all future communication to be in writing. That raised 'a lot of red flags' within the association, Bumpus said, and a decision was made several days later to suspend Cinema Politica for the rest of the summer and reconsider the group's use of the building in the fall."
That first paragraph conveys the perception to your readers that Woods Hole Cinema Politica cut off verbal communication with the WHCA which then raised "a lot of red flags" for them. This is far from accurate, when in fact the Cinema Politica letter that was written stated clearly that:
"We are willing to work with you [the Woods Hole Community Association] on the matter, but we are not sure what more can be done from our end. We hope the Board is able to come to terms with its position and the decision it will ultimately have to make. We would appreciate hearing back from you in writing."
(See the last paragraph of the letter posted in our blog: http://www.cinemapolitica.org/blog/woods-hole/woods-hole-defends-freedom-speech)
As you can see, we kept open all opportunities for future verbal communication even though we may have requested a reply in writing -- a far from unreasonable request given the circumstance, but apparently enough for the association to refuse to rent the Fire Hall to us anymore this summer because of our screening of films related to Israel’s Occupation of Palestine.
If it is possible to correct the paragraphs in the article, or add clarification, that would be very much appreciated.
Again, thank you for an otherwise very good article.
Chris Spannos
Woods Hole Cinema Politica
Reply this comment