avatar
Big Business, As Seen On TV


George Monbiot

Our

liberty could scarcely be entrusted to a more rackety bunch. Journalists are,

quite rightly, almost universally reviled. But the freedom of a nation depends

in large measure on the freedom they enjoy. If reporters are forced to show the

world not as it is but as a handful of multimillionaires would like it to be,

then the people they reach are less able to choose wisely. It is the curious

duty of democratic governments to defend this freedom, often at great cost to

themselves. It is a duty this government has just comprehensively flunked.

If

you want to know why the media needs to be regulated, take a look at Greg Dyke’s

speech to the CBI last month. "Too much of Britain’s mainstream news and

current affairs programming," the BBC’s director-general complained,

"has ignored or failed to understand the real business agenda." In

future, he insisted, the BBC must show more "understanding" of the

difficulties companies face. "I am totally committed to taking business

centre stage in the BBC."

Now

imagine what the response would have been had Mr Dyke said the same about any

other political or economic movement: socialism, fascism, trades unionism, the

aristocracy or the European Union, for example. It is surely a measure of how

effectively the corporations, working through the media, have colonised our

minds that his speech elicited barely a squeak of protest. In principle, Mr

Dyke’s enthusiasms are supposed to be restrained by the BBC’s governors. But

their chair, previously chairman of both the freight company NFC and the Private

Finance Initiative, is hardly likely to intervene. Power shall speak peace unto

power.

Mr

Dyke’s views might be less consequential if the rest of the media were busy

confronting wealth and power. But almost every deviation from the pro-corporate

political consensus has now been stamped out. For the past three years, Channel

4’s science and public health programming has been dominated by the view that

big business has our best interests at heart. ITN shares its staff and studios

with its part-owned subsidiary, Corporate Television Networks, which makes

programmes for British Airways, Philip Morris and Shell. Granada used a

corporate lawsuit as an excuse to shut down its investigative series World in

Action.

Most

newspapers expose only the misdemeanors of the powerless, while the central

political issue of our age, the corporate takeover of public life, is left to

tiny underfunded groups such as Corporatewatch to investigate. Almost every new

commercial development is represented by the mainstream media as a "jobs

boost", even if, in reality, it is a job-destroying, self-serving

monstrosity. And dumbing down and trivialisation are, in this increasingly

complex world, the foremost enemies of radical analysis.

Even

the web in Britain is proving vulnerable to censorship, as our libel laws are

used to force service providers to remove material the rich and powerful don’t

like. Shell, for example, is currently seeking to close a site (www.nuclearcrimes.com).

which alleges irregularities in its handling of nuclear waste.

Yet,

far from seeking to defend free speech, the government is proposing to subject

the media to even fewer effective controls. The white paper on communications it

published on Tuesday will allow companies to regulate the "qualitative

elements of public service broadcasting" themselves. It rightly defends

multiculturalism, but offers no new protections for political diversity. In

practice, the "impartiality" it demands is seen to have been achieved

if neither of the two main political parties are offended. If they do not

disagree upon an issue, then there is no statutory need to explore it further.

As the scope of politics contracts, in other words, so does that of the media.

The

white paper celebrates Britain’s libel laws (which do for big business in this

country what official censorship does for oppressive states) as a "bedrock

of legal protections" which helps "to achieve the right balance".

The ban on advertising companies buying TV stations will be rescinded, but ads

by groups such as Amnesty International will remain forbidden, in case

broadcasting is "skewed by those best able to fund advertising".

Corporate adverts, of course, present no such dangers. The paper envisages

"greater consolidation of the ITV network" and fewer contraints on

newspaper mergers. It gives proprietors everything they want, in other words,

while enabling dissenting voices to be stifled.

"During

times of universal deceit," George Orwell wrote, "telling the truth

becomes a revolutionary act." The government has backed universal deceit.

  

Leave a comment