Zcom_simple

Z Comments

Content Type:
First Name: Last Name:  

Person BlogPost Mm2594: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

Or maybe, we should all look at the world as it actually is. . . One of the things I actually ad...

Person BlogPost Mm2594: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

You assume a strategy that Nader has never endorsed nor shown even the slightest interest in foll...

Person BlogPost Mm2594: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

A couple things ARE obvious though: 1. Chomsky's silence on ballot and debate access is complic...

Person BlogPost Mm2594: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

Of course, the risk in this strategy is that Nader would not withdraw at any point in the process...

Person BlogPost Mm2594: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

5. The Estalishment left for its part -- assured of Nader's willingness to withdraw under certain...

Person BlogPost Mm2594: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

Here's what should have happened: 1. Nader should have announced his candidacy explicitly as an ...

Person BlogPost Hoogland: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

I was wrong to label Chomsky's logic as "suspect" - this discussion has helped clarify for me whe...

Person BlogPost Iragladnick: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

Graeme said: >I couldn't possibly care less what William Safire thinks The point is that Safire'...

Person BlogPost Mttmalin: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

Here is an exerpt from Chomsky regarding Bush V. Kerry on September 20. “For the world, the diffe...

Person BlogPost Mttmalin: Comment On Chomsky: Replying to Nader

I think that what Chomsky is saying is that the potential (and likely) negative consequences of a...
Loading_border