Send article through e-mail

printer friendly version
Search





Iraq: When Should US Troops Leave?

[This is the footnoted version of a presentation given to the Bloomfield/Glen Ridge Caucus organized by Bloomfield and Glen Ridge Peace Action, February 2, 2008]

 
Everyone who isn't a total flunky of the Bush administration knows that the war in Iraq has been based on lies.
 
In fact, according to a recent study by the Center for Public Integrity and the Fund for Independence in Journalism, in the two years following 9-11 top administration officials told 935 lies about the national security threat posed by Iraq.1
 
But many people of good will wonder: even if the war was the result of lies, even if the US invasion was unjust and illegal, what do we do now? Does the "Pottery Barn rule" so often mentioned by Colin Powell -- we broke it, we own it -- apply. And if we own it, what do we do with it?
 
Well, in fact the Pottery Barn denies it has such a rule, but in any case the so-called Pottery Barn rule has no moral standing. The colonial powers ravaged Africa: but that didn't give them the right to own it and decide its future. The Soviet Union invaded Hungary and Czechoslovakia, but this didn't give them right to decide the fate of those countries.
 
As Noam Chomsky has noted, an invader has no rights, only obligations.2 The only people with rights in Iraq are the Iraqi people. What do they think should happen? This ought to be at least the starting point for our inquiry.
 
Now the problem of course is that it's not so easy to ascertain the views of Iraqis -- after all, Iraq today is a non-functioning society, in the midst of massive violence, with more than one out of every seven Iraqis displaced -- either within the country or as a refugee. Town meetings are not easily organized in Iraq. Participatory democracy doesn't flourish amidst car-bombs and air-strikes.
 
Nevertheless, we do have some indication of what Iraqis think. For example, focus groups of Iraqis were organized for the U.S. military this past November. According to a report in the Washington Post, which was able to obtain a summary of the results,
 
"Iraqis of all sectarian and ethnic groups believe that the U.S. military invasion is the primary root of the violent differences among them, and see the departure of 'occupying forces' as the key to national reconciliation...."3
 
Pentagon analysts said they thought this was good news because it indicated that Iraqis held some "shared beliefs" that might eventually allow them to surmount the divisions that have led to a civil war. It is indeed good news for Iraqis, but needless to say it's not much of an endorsement of the US military presence.
 
We don't have many details of the focus group findings, but there have been a variety of public opinion polls that have been carried out in Iraq -- by different polling companies -- that are consistent with one another and with the US military focus group results.
 
If you look at the tables I distributed, you'll see (in Table 1) that as of the latest poll in August 2007, 47 percent of Iraqis want US forces to leave immediately4; more than half of the Arab population -- that is, the Sunni Arabs and the Shia Arabs, excluding the Kurds -- supports immediate withdrawal,5 and the Kurds of course are the one group who do not have US troops in their region. The sentiment in favor of withdrawal is strongest in Anbar province, where US officials are so proud of their new relationship with some Sunni tribes.6 Table 2 shows that 79 percent of the population, including 84 percent of the Shiite Arabs and 98 percent of the Sunni Arabs, oppose the presence of "coalition" forces in Iraq.
 
 

Table 1: Iraqi Public Opinion, August 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
How long do you think US and other coalition forces should remain in Iraq? They should:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
3/5/2007
11/22/2005
 
All
Sunni
Shiite
Kurd
All
Sunni
Shiite
Kurd
All
Leave now
47
72
44
8
35
55
28
11
26
Remain until security is restored
34
27
38
36
38
41
39
28
31
Remain until the Iraqi government is stronger†
10
*
10
28
14
3
18
28
19
Remain until the Iraqi security forces can operate independently
7
1
6
18
11
1
13
24
16
Remain longer, but leave eventually
2
0
1
8
2
*
2
7
3
Never leave
*
0
*
2
1
0
*
2
1
No opinion
*
*
*
1
*
0
*
*
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* Less than 0.5 percent.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
† In 2005, "Remain until the Iraqi government elected in December is in place"
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Source: ABC NEWS/BBC/NHK POLL - Iraq: Where Things Stand, Embargoed For Release After 7 a.m. Monday, Sept. 10, 2007, Iraqis' Own Surge Assessment: Few See Security Gains, Question 21, pp. 25-26, http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/1043a1IraqWhereThingsStand.pdf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Table 2: Iraqi Public Opinion, August 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose the presence of coalition forces in Iraq?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
--------Support--------
---------Oppose--------
No
 
NET
Strongly
Somewhat
NET
Somewhat
Strongly
opin.
8/24/2007
21
5
16
79
26
53
*
Sunni
2
*
1
98
25
73
0
Shiite
16
2
15
84
30
54
0
Kurdish
70
21
48
29
20
9
1
3/5/2007
22
6
16
78
32
46
*
Sunni
3
*
3
97
29
68
0
Shiite
17
2
15
83
39
44
0
Kurdish
75
28
47
25
21
4
*
11/22/2005
32
13
19
65
21
44
3
2/28/2004
39
13
26
51
20
31
10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* Less than 0.5 percent.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Source: ABC NEWS/BBC/NHK POLL - Iraq: Where Things Stand, Embargoed For Release After 7 a.m. Monday, Sept. 10, 2007, Iraqis' Own Surge Assessment: Few See Security Gains, Question 19, pp. 24-25, http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/1043a1IraqWhereThingsStand.pdf

 
 
Because these data are from August, the fraction saying that the US surge increased security has probably gone up from the 12-18 percent shown in Table 3. In December deaths were down -- but one of the reasons for that is that huge swaths of Baghdad have undergone ethnic cleansing -- perhaps 700,000 people have fled or been driven out of the capital7 -- so there simply aren't as many potential victims. In January deaths started upwards again, both for Iraqi civilians and US soldiers, but in any case they are lower than in mid-2007. But look at item "c" of table 3, which poses the crucial question: What has the impact of the surge been on the conditions for political dialogue in Iraq. 10 percent think the surge has improved things, 70 percent think it's made thinks worse. And this is true across the ethnic and sectarian divide.
 
 

Table 3: Iraqi Public Opinion, August 2007
 
 
 
 
 
As you may know, the United States has increased the number of its forces in Baghdad and surrounding provinces in the past six months. For each item I read, please tell me if you think this increase in US forces has made it better, made it worse, or had no effect.
 
 
 
 
 
Do you think this increase in US forces has made [read category] better, worse, or had no effect?
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
Better
Worse
Had no effect
No opinion
 
 
 
 
 
a. Security in areas where these forces have been sent
18
70
11
*
Sunni
6
89
6
0
Shiite
22
66
11
*
Kurdish
33
43
23
1
b. Security in other areas of Iraq
12
68
20
*
Sunni
5
86
9
0
Shiite
13
64
23
*
Kurdish
22
48
28
2
c. Conditions for political dialogue in Iraq
10
70
20
*
Sunni
1
85
14
0
Shiite
12
66
22
*
Kurdish
20
55
24
1
d. The ability of the Iraqi government to carry out its work.
12
65
22
*
Sunni
2
79
19
0
Shiite
16
63
21
0
Kurdish
22
47
30
1
e. The pace of reconstruction in Iraq
9
67
24
*
Sunni
3
78
19
0
Shiite
11
66
23
0
Kurdish
11
52
37
1
f. The pace of economic development in Iraq
6
67
26
*
Sunni
3
79
18
*
Shiite
9
67
24
*
Kurdish
5
49
45
1
 
 
 
 
 
* Less than 0.5 percent.
 
 
 
 
Source: ABC NEWS/BBC/NHK POLL - Iraq: Where Things Stand, Embargoed For Release After 7 a.m. Monday, Sept. 10, 2007, Iraqis' Own Surge Assessment: Few See Security Gains, Question 20, p. 25, http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/1043a1IraqWhereThingsStand.pdf

 
 
Table 4 shows that Iraqis are four times as likely to think that US forces make security worse than that they make it better, and Table 5 indicates that 57 percent of Iraqis, including 93 percent of Sunni Arabs and half of the Shia Arabs, think that attacks on coalition forces are acceptable, while substantial majorities of all groups oppose attacks on Iraqi government forces. As Table 6 shows, Iraqis have much more confidence in the Iraqi Army, the police, and even militias than they do in the US and British occupation forces.
 
 

Table 4: Iraqi Public Opinion, August 2007
Overall, do you think the presence of US forces in Iraq is making security in our country better, worse, or having no effect on the situation?
 
Better
Worse
No effect
No opinion
8/24/2007
18
72
9
*
Sunni
2
95
3
0
Shiite
17
73
10
0
Kurdish
53
28
17
2
3/5/2007
21
69
10
*
Sunni
2
94
4
0
Shiite
19
71
10
*
Kurdish
67
15
18
0
* Less than 0.5 percent.
 
 
 
 
Source: ABC NEWS/BBC/NHK POLL - Iraq: Where Things Stand, Embargoed For Release After 7 a.m. Monday, Sept. 10, 2007, Iraqis' Own Surge Assessment: Few See Security Gains, Question 22, p. 26, http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/1043a1IraqWhereThingsStand.pdf

 

Table 5: Iraqi Public Opinion, August 2007
Thinking about the political action of other people, do you find each of these items to be acceptable or not acceptable?
a. Attacks on coalition forces
Accept-
Not
No
 
 
able
acceptable
opinion
 
8/24/2007
57
43
*
 
Sunni
93
7
*
 
Shiite
50
50
0
 
Kurdish
5
94
1
 
3/5/2007
51
49
*
 
Sunni
94
6
0
 
Shiite
35
65
*
 
Kurdish
7
93
0
 
2/28/2004
17
78
5
 
b. Attacks on Iraqi government forces
Accept-
Not
No
 
 
able
acceptable
opin.
 
8/24/2007
7
93
*
 
Sunni
18
82
0
 
Shiite
2
98
*
 
Kurdish
2
97
1
 
3/5/2007
12
88
0
 
Sunni
34
66
0
 
Shiite
1
99
0
 
Kurdish
1
99
0
 
* Less than 0.5 percent.
 
 
 
 
Source: ABC NEWS/BBC/NHK POLL - Iraq: Where Things Stand, Embargoed For Release After 7 a.m. Monday, Sept. 10, 2007, Iraqis' Own Surge Assessment: Few See Security Gains, Question 23, pp. 26-27, http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/1043a1IraqWhereThingsStand.pdf

 

Table 6: Iraqi Public Opinion, August 2007
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, please tell me if you have a great deal of confidence, quite a lot of confidence, not very much confidence, or none at all...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------Confident--------
---Not confident---
No
 
Net
Great deal
A lot
Net
Not much
None
Opinion
The Iraqi Army
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
67
23
43
33
21
12
0
Sunni
34
7
27
66
34
32
0
Shiite
84
29
54
16
15
1
0
Kurdish
80
38
43
20
16
4
0
The Police
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
69
33
36
31
17
15
0
Sunni
37
9
28
63
26
37
0
Shiite
84
43
40
16
12
4
0
Kurdish
86
47
39
14
11
3
0
US & UK Occupation Forces
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
14
4
11
86
27
58
0
Sunni
1
*
1
99
19
79
0
Shiite
9
1
8
91
32
59
0
Kurdish
53
18
34
47
30
17
0
3/5/2007
18
6
12
82
30
52
*
Sunni
3
0
3
97
18
80
0
Shiite
12
3
9
88
42
46
0
Kurdish
67
26
41
33
24
9
*
11/22/2005
18
7
11
78
23
55
5
2/28/2004
25
8
17
66
23
43
8
11/15/2003
19
7
12
71
20
52
9
Local Leaders in Your Community
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
46
11
36
53
34
20
*
Sunni
20
1
19
80
41
39
0
Shiite
56
11
46
43
33
10
*
Kurdish
72
30
42
28
19
9
*
National Government of Iraq
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
39
11
28
61
31
30
0
Sunni
4
1
3
96
32
64
0
Shiite
58
17
41
42
30
12
0
Kurdish
54
13
41
46
31
15
0
3/5/2007
49
18
31
51
27
24
0
Sunni
8
1
7
92
36
56
0
Shiite
72
30
42
28
22
6
0
Kurdish
73
18
55
27
19
8
0
11/22/2005
53
23
30
41
25
16
6
Local Militia in this Area
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8/24/2007
24
11
13
68
26
43
8
Sunni
2
*
1
93
27
66
6
Shiite
32
12
20
67
30
36
1
Kurdish
41
28
13
24
13
11
35
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* = less than 0.5 percent