Thirty-one months ago, when the Service Employees International Union first defeated the National Union of Healthcare Workers in a unit of 45,000 service and technical workers at Kaiser Permanente in California, SEIU leader Dave Regan proclaimed that “NUHW is now, for all intents and purposes, irrelevant.”
That obituary proved a little premature. Rank-and-file supporters of NUHW remained alive and kicking, not only at Kaiser but also in other healthcare workplaces around the state. Using member-based internal and external organizing methods, NUHW largely bucked the national tide of concession bargaining in nearly 20 new units composed of previously unorganized workers or SEIU defectors.
With strong financial backing from its new affiliation partner, the California Nurses Association (CNA), NUHW has been gearing up since January for a re-run of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election at Kaiser. SEIU won the first round in October 2010 with 18,290 votes to NUHW’s 11,364.
A major theme of the joint NUHW-CAN campaign this year was the need to resist SEIU’s damaging contract concessions to Kaiser and other hugely profitable California hospital chains. To back up their own anti-concessions stance, NUHW and CNA members at Kaiser conducted two of the four largest strikes in the U.S. since 2011. During both of these statewide walkouts, SEIU urged its followers to ignore the picket lines set up by unions that don’t participate in the “Labor-Management Partnership” (LMP) led by SEIU.
When the votes were tallied at the NLRB regional office in Oakland last Thursday, NUHW support in Kaiser’s largest bargaining unit had increased by 15 percent—but SEIU, the vocal opponent of striking and fan of partnership, won again with 18,844 votes versus NUHW’s 13,101. (Another 334 workers chose no union).
For hundreds of Kaiser LMP participants headed toward the Disneyland Hotel in Anaheim for a big May 3-5 meeting in the Magic Kingdom Ballroom (located in the hotel’s Fantasy Tower), SEIU’s victory was good news indeed. Delegates to that fun-filled confab were scheduled to discuss “the future of unions and health care partnerships” with speakers like multi-millionaire Bernard Tyson, the incoming Chairman and CEO of Kaiser, who will offer “his view of partnership and how it can become a strategic differentiator for Kaiser” as the hospital chain “face[s] the demands of health care reform.”
Another keynoter last Friday was Dave Regan, whose post-election statement deplored the amount of money being spent on inter-union competition at Kaiser “at a time when unionization is down to 7 percent in the private sector.” According to Regan, “it’s time for people like the leaders of NUHW and CNA, who call themselves ‘progressives,’ to focus on organizing non-union workers instead of attacking people who already are in a union and have the best contract in the country.” In Anaheim, Regan argued that SEIU's friendly relationship with Kaiser insures future union growth as the giant HMO expands its workforce by 90,000 to meet the increased demand for healthcare generated by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Several hundred Kaiser workers, with a very different view of their employer, gathered at the NLRB in downtown Oakland to observe the vote count or await the outcome a few blocks away at CNA headquarters. These NUHW supporters were definitely not pleased with the results last Thursday. Most were off the job, at their own expense, or came long distances after work on their own time. Yet, when the trend in favor of the incumbent union became clear, the previously planned and hoped-for victory celebration didn’t dissolve into a pity party.
Instead, the roomful of red T-shirt wearers began an impromptu rank-and-file speak out about how a militant minority of Kaiser workers, still trapped in a management-oriented union, could continue their struggle to replace it with something better. As posed by one NUHW activist, the question facing everyone was “what are we going to do tomorrow?”
“We were hopeful this time would be different than last time,” said Roberto Alvarez, a 17-year Kaiser X-ray technician from southern California. “In Orange County, we tripled the support for NUHW, so it was a great leap forward for us there. We know what the future is with SEIU, so what we have to do now is keep on fighting.”
That future, according to Alvarez and others interviewed yesterday, will include further deterioration of working conditions, weak enforcement of the “best contract in the country,” and, at some point, major SEIU give-backs on pensions, job security, and medical coverage for active employees. These takeaways have already been won by Kaiser competitors like Dignity Healthcare and Daughters of Charity Health System.
“My theory is that SEIU has promised Kaiser a lot of stuff, cuts that are coming down sooner or later, now that the election is out of the way,“ Alvarez said.
What Strategy Now?
The usual rank-and-file strategy for resisting concessions and trying to change the direction of a union calls for replacing the existing leadership. Elect new stewards, bargaining committee members, and local officers willing to wage a more effective fight.
But NUHW supporters believe there are few opportunities to do that within the SEIU structure, given the experience of workers at Kaiser and other California hospitals when they tried to reform SEIU nationally in 2008. That effort led to the ouster of all their elected officers. Their statewide local, United Healthcare Workers, was put under trusteeship and hundreds of key workplace leaders resigned or were removed as shop stewards and Kaiser “contract specialists.”
The strong union activists sidelined by this SEIU coup helped sustain, and have now added to, NUHW’s shop floor support, as reflected in the latest vote count. In some facilities, their network has majority support and could wrest bargaining rights away from SEIU if petitioning for decertification elections at individual Kaiser hospitals was legally possible.
Since 2010, these “member organizers” also enabled NUHW to win bargaining rights for 4,000 Kaiser workers in smaller professional and technical units who could switch unions more easily. All are still engaged in protracted negotiations with Kaiser, which has stonewalled NUHW to give its larger union rival a much-used campaign talking point: ie all NUHW and CNA do is fight the boss, never win a contract.
NUHW backers’ deep estrangement from SEIU is obviously not yet shared by enough of their co-workers, who again opted for the security of the status quo rather than the perceived risk of changing unions.
“There was no way NUHW or CNA could convince us to give up our great wages, health coverage, pension and job security, especially since NUHW has been unable to bargain a contract at Kaiser for more than three years,” said Cleto Delizo, a Kaiser worker from Sacramento quoted in a SEIU’s post-election press release. “This is now settled, once and for all, and we are ready to give all of our attention to doing our jobs providing the best possible care to our patients.”
NUHW-CNA organizers believed they had made greater progress overcoming SEIU’s campaign of strike-baiting and fear-mongering about restarting negotiations with Kaiser under a more militant union banner. That major change in union representation would have meant beginning negotiations on a successor agreement right away, with a lot more membership education, agitation, and organization than SEIU-UHW encourages these days. Although the old Kaiser contract terms would have remained in effect during these talks, SEIU argued that its current 3-year agreement with the HMO provided more worker security and protection, without the burden of having to become more involved in union activity.
Pre-election assessments, done systematically and in multiple ways by NUHW-CNA supporters, showed that 18,000 to 19,000 workers were ready to vote against SEIU anyway, an estimate that proved to be off by more than 5,000.
In a post-election message to NUHW supporters, union president Sal Rosselli said he was “stunned by these election results.” NUHW’s post-election statement applauded the courage of its thousands of supporters who stood up against “fear, intimidation, and collusion with management” and “voted for change in a tough economy.”
Some CNA activists predict that Kaiser may now feel emboldened to intensify its current “offensive against nurses” in the run-up to their contract negotiations next year. Already, one CNA rep reports, RNs face daily hassles over Kaiser’s unilaterally imposed and punitive attendance policy, plus increased workloads due to understaffing.
However, CNA believes the widespread engagement of its 17,000 Kaiser members with the service and technical workers provided a kind of “boot camp” for building their own 2014 contract campaign. “Nurses gained far greater unity among themselves to fight Kaiser than any bargaining prep would offer,” CNA Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro observed. “We have always needed worker solidarity to defeat the corporate agenda.”
The “unity across classifications” forged at Kaiser during the latest round of NUHW-CNA resistance to the LMP is not without its potential fault lines. But, according to Rosselli, “that unity is not going away. It will persist in our workplaces, in the friendships we’ve made, and in the continued affiliation between NUHW and CNA. It will fuel our continued struggle to stop the cuts that Kaiser is trying to force down our throats with the shameful complicity of SEIU-UHW.”