Capitalism vs. ParEcon
Comparing Capitalism & ParEcon Workplace Organization
How are workplaces structured and what implications does it have for people's say over their own work lives? This page compares capitalist and parecon workplace organization.
|
"The Scream" by Edvard Munch |
"Descending" by M.C.Escher |
Introducing Capitalist Workplace Organization
|
Introducing ParEcon Workplace Organization
In a parecon, with balanced job complexes, workplaces are classless. The key structure is the workers council -- and its many component layers of individuals, team, divisions, etc. Each worker has a balanced job complex and is able to exercize their capabilities at a range of tasks suited to their talents and interests, but also involving its fair share of less empowering activity. Decisions are taken at various levels, in light of more encompassing decisions at broader levels -- teams operate in light of division level priorities, in turn in light of whole workplace policy, etc. The deciders, always, are the workers. There is no one who is anything other than what everyone else is -- a worker with a balanced job complex. Overall, each worker has comparable conditions, comparable empowerment, comparable reinforcing of capabilities on the job. Information flows are designed to convey knowledge so that each actor is in position to have an informed opinion about decisions that impact hi or her. There are gathering places for people to develop viewpoints, attach themselves to agendas, and make a case for them -- at every level of the workplace, and even during the normal give and take of daily work itself. They are entirely public, as is all information. Decisions are made, ultimately and always, by all those affected (including say for those outside the workplace by other institutional means) in proportion as they are affected, and with access to all needed information. Voting procedures vary from case to case -- sometimes one person one vote, fifty percent plus one makes sense, other times more may be needed to decide a new position up to ful consensus in some cases. The number of people involved in decisions will vary too, in accord with who is most affected, or not affected at all. |
Evaluating Capitalist Workplace OrganizationIf the aim is to enshrine and defend hierarchies of power and privilege as the highest priority, then historical experience and reason both suggest that capitalist workplace organization is optimal, or very nearly so. But if the aim is to have the most efficacious and just use of productive potentials of a whole workforce, while respecting the dignity and integrity of each member, and while conveying means of best utilizing the creative and productive capacities of each member, and while plumbing the best insights of each member with appropriate decision making power accorded to each member -- then the capitalist workplace organization is an abomination. At its best, working as it is conceived to work, and without suffering flaws due to all manner of legal and interpersonal vendettas of interpersonal scorn at the top, it utilizes the talents of a subset of the workforce -- roughly 20% -- but squanders a substantial part of even those not on producing valued outputs in light of the broad social implications (including pollution, etc.) but on ruling over those employed below and preserving the dominance of those employed above. And it totally squanders the more creative and initiating potentials of the completely subordinate part of the workforce, shoehorning them into slots that demand only subservience and endurance of boredom -- again to ensure hierarchies of power and income and not on behalf of quality output. |
Evaluating ParEcon Workplace OrganizationIf the aim is to enshring and defend hierarchies of power and privilege as the highest priority, then the parecon workplace design, in any of its many varients, is an abomination. But if the aim is to have the most efficacious and just use of productive potentials of a whole workforce, while respecting the dignity and integrity of each member, and while conveying means of best utilizing the creative and productive capacities of each member, and while plumbing the best insights of each member with appropriate decision making power accorded to each member -- then the capitalist workplace organization is optimal, or very nearly so. Parecon workplace organizations utilizes the talents of the entire workforce, in the manner they are inclined and willing to provide, in accord with the needs and desires of consumers of products, and in accord with delivering self management and equity while preserving diversity and extending mutual solidarity. |
Some Relevant Links |
Some Relevant Links
|




